- Joined
- Sep 9, 2015
- Messages
- 2,023
- Reaction Score
- 10,826
In the WNBA, is it all downhill from the draft?
ESPN has done a pretty thorough job of analyzing the WNBA from its inception to the present. The yearly question for the league seems to be about the impact the number one pick will have on the growth and prosperity of the women's professional game. Of course, this year it's Bre,
Will Stewart be able to elevate the WNBA to new heights, especially in light of the on-going questions of its relevance and sustainability? The ESPN article concludes that in the history of the women's game no single player has been able to do it. Not Dee, not Maya, not anyone. The corollary question is has Bre reached the apogee of the sport at UConn? And if she continues to grow to greatness as many of us expect, will it matter? It's something like the philosophical query: If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it make a sound?
I don't know the answer to any of these questions. Many ESPN readers reacted to the story by arguing that the WNBA will never become relevant because it is of generally poor quality. Others say that the game has improved greatly but not enough to draw much interest. Most WNBA arenas are empty, and players are poorly paid. Even some players have chosen to skip participating or based their playing on overseas commitments that pay much better.
I tend to agree with the fan who commented on the ESPN article by saying “The quality of play in the WNBA is great, I'm sure. I'm just likely not ever going to watch it unless I have a real rooting interest or something. “ I don't watch the WNBA games for that reason: I have no rooting interest in them. It's easy for me to care about America's national teams but only when they play as a group. I love the Huskies from long watching and an admiration for their high standards and sustained success. Sort of like a parent who adopts a child and comes to care as if it were his own.
Many of you enjoy the WNBA, and I thought I'd watch a little this year to see why. Trouble is, I don't really identify with a team, so I'm not avid to see any particular group. Watching Morgan and Moriah play against each other is not my cup of tea. I love them both and want them both to win.
For me, the former great UConn players now playing professionally will always be Huskies first. My memories of them will be with UConn printed on their unis.
ESPN has done a pretty thorough job of analyzing the WNBA from its inception to the present. The yearly question for the league seems to be about the impact the number one pick will have on the growth and prosperity of the women's professional game. Of course, this year it's Bre,
Will Stewart be able to elevate the WNBA to new heights, especially in light of the on-going questions of its relevance and sustainability? The ESPN article concludes that in the history of the women's game no single player has been able to do it. Not Dee, not Maya, not anyone. The corollary question is has Bre reached the apogee of the sport at UConn? And if she continues to grow to greatness as many of us expect, will it matter? It's something like the philosophical query: If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it, did it make a sound?
I don't know the answer to any of these questions. Many ESPN readers reacted to the story by arguing that the WNBA will never become relevant because it is of generally poor quality. Others say that the game has improved greatly but not enough to draw much interest. Most WNBA arenas are empty, and players are poorly paid. Even some players have chosen to skip participating or based their playing on overseas commitments that pay much better.
I tend to agree with the fan who commented on the ESPN article by saying “The quality of play in the WNBA is great, I'm sure. I'm just likely not ever going to watch it unless I have a real rooting interest or something. “ I don't watch the WNBA games for that reason: I have no rooting interest in them. It's easy for me to care about America's national teams but only when they play as a group. I love the Huskies from long watching and an admiration for their high standards and sustained success. Sort of like a parent who adopts a child and comes to care as if it were his own.
Many of you enjoy the WNBA, and I thought I'd watch a little this year to see why. Trouble is, I don't really identify with a team, so I'm not avid to see any particular group. Watching Morgan and Moriah play against each other is not my cup of tea. I love them both and want them both to win.
For me, the former great UConn players now playing professionally will always be Huskies first. My memories of them will be with UConn printed on their unis.