Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hans Sprungfeld, post: 4843471, member: 181"] Numbers are measurable. That part is very very simple. And they don't favor your point. I think that's where you wish I'd stop. By contrast, your suppositions are speculative, and they are incorrect, no matter how much you fantasize or argue otherwise. YOU are the one who introduced numbers Every game's outcome tonight will be measured in comparative numbers. Every bet will have its winners & losers determined by measurable comparative numbers. I've objected to how out of line your use of "1000%" is from reality, and I've claimed that such gross inaccuracies degarade the discussion and frustrate clear communication on this board. You can't defend your chosen number, and you won't refute my claim. Instead you are repeating that I (and others) know what you are saying and what you mean. Based on what? Do you have anything to offer except blind faith in your cognitive egocentricity combined with seemingly reflexive contempt for further examination? At this point, I question your rhetoric, logical reasoning, spirit of inquiry, cooperative attitude, and commitment to healthy exchange between fellow fans...in addition to your numbers. Fortunately, during this absurd contretemps I've had a great crazy great time with my favorite 23-month old, seen two satisfying UConn basketball wins, watched Butler finish off Marquette, and learned that Kansas & Tennessee lost on the road, so that UNC was the only other Top 10 besides UConn team to win on the road this week . And that's gotta be inarguably 604% slightly better than [I]something[/I], right? You know what I'm sayin'? [MEDIA=youtube]CO9ysLspb4Q[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach