- Joined
- Oct 20, 2023
- Messages
- 455
- Reaction Score
- 2,398

The Bilas Index: The only men's hoops preview you need
Just catching up on the men's college basketball season? Have no fear. Jay Bilas is here with all the information you need.
It definitely feels like a "bridge" year. If CBB doesn't snipe us this year, it feels like next year and beyond will be in overdrive. Along with us, there look like a couple of high end teams out there this year, none of them on the level of our '24 though.
Think about this statement and how immensely far the UCONN program has come that we are very disappointed and incredulous that someone would NOT include in a list of Final Four schools.On the CBS sports site, Gary Parrish doesn't even have UConn in his Final 4 prediction.
But watch him change his tune before the tournament starts.
He didn’t have us beating Purdue..On the CBS sports site, Gary Parrish doesn't even have UConn in his Final 4 prediction.
But watch him change his tune before the tournament starts.
He knows what he's doing. He knows the winning formula is us ranked outside the top 5, so he intentionally made us #1 to screw with our mojo. Damn Dukie!Not sure I love Bilas listing us as #1, but how blessed are we to have that particular "problem" to deal with?!!
To be fair though `24 is an all time great team. I mean if not for injuries that team is likely 39-1 with the only real L at full strength we took being the Crayton road game. Yes i know its spelled wrong its an inside joke.Along with us, there look like a couple of high end teams out there this year, none of them on the level of our '24 though.
What I’m feeling with this team is that it would be one that actually has to win close games, which is not something we’ve had to do in a long time. It’s in part why I think Hurley continues to call out Mahaney, as you do need a great PG in close games. Whether he establishes that role is TBD.It definitely feels like a "bridge" year. If CBB doesn't snipe us this year, it feels like next year and beyond will be in overdrive. Along with us, there look like a couple of high end teams out there this year, none of them on the level of our '24 though.
Single elim tourney is probably the only silver bullet moving forward so long the staff stays in place. It's weird to put a statue out while he's still coaching, so the University has PLENTY of time to avoid the DWade debacle.
Disagree, we're going to blow a lot of teams out.What I’m feeling with this team is that it would be one that actually has to win close games, which is not something we’ve had to do in a long time. It’s in part why I think Hurley continues to call out Mahaney, as you do need a great PG in close games. Whether he establishes that role is TBD.
I’m not expecting a lot of runaway games like last year, as the team doesn’t have that level of defensive firepower to just suffocate the opposition into submission. In a lot of ways it’s normalizing to the pack, the top of the pack. The last two years they’ve been in a tier of their own. One of the remaining beefs with Hurley has always been ability to win close big games and I think this year he’ll have some chances.
This team is not “bullet proof” so will have be scrappy and opportunistic, situationally smart and efficient, learn how to manufacture wins rather than just run over the opponent.
Beauty of a message board!Disagree, we're going to blow a lot of teams out.
They haven't started out so well.What I notice from that list is really that the SEC is just loaded this year.
When you wrote about defense, it reminded me of the win at Gampel against Creighton, the first game UConn got their #1 ranking. That was my favorite non NCAAT and non BE tournament win. They had a vice grip and suffocated and choked the life out of Creighton's high powered offense that game. Watch it again if you have time, especially the 2nd half, where Creighton had 2 TOs and 3 shot clock violations if my memory serves me correct. They were having trouble even getting a shot up. UConn was impeccable with their communication on defense and their switches on screens. It was a complete 180 degree difference from when they played Creighton later in Omaha.What I’m feeling with this team is that it would be one that actually has to win close games, which is not something we’ve had to do in a long time. It’s in part why I think Hurley continues to call out Mahaney, as you do need a great PG in close games. Whether he establishes that role is TBD.
I’m not expecting a lot of runaway games like last year, as the team doesn’t have that level of defensive firepower to just suffocate the opposition into submission. In a lot of ways it’s normalizing to the pack, the top of the pack. The last two years they’ve been in a tier of their own. One of the remaining beefs with Hurley has always been ability to win close big games and I think this year he’ll have some chances.
This team is not “bullet proof” so will have be scrappy and opportunistic, situationally smart and efficient, learn how to manufacture wins rather than just run over the opponent.
I have to agree. This team seems to me once the players get comfortable with running the offense they are going to score a lot of points and are going to be a team that can get away from teams quickly. I think itll take some time to get there and it may be frustrating at times but once it clicks this team could be one of the most explosive offenses in the country.Disagree, we're going to blow a lot of teams out.