Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Chief00, post: 3552392"]
Quite frankly, it’s not a criticism, but they have minimal interest in the legalities. They always have someone who works that stuff out for them. KO tells them he had a contract and the man didn’t pay him.  That’s good enough for them and Calhoun actually instilled in them the concept of brotherhood  - so they are very comfortable in that space. The legal nuance that there are two parties to a contract and KO effectively voided the contract by his actions, layers on too much complexity and is too tedious. So on this subject, Chief stays in his lane. Barring a completely clueless arbitrator,  I believe Chief knows the likely outcomes and KO’s legal team has stumbled so badly, they have effectively usurped any negotiating leverage they had.
I would still like UConn to throw $1M KO’s way, so he can save a little face, his lawyer gets a 1/3 and counts his blessing/goes away, but most importantly the former players can pretend he got paid.  Ironically, “he got paid” auto corrected to “he got laid” and that perhaps caused this whole mess in the first place.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach