Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Does UConn Need a Low-Post "Banger"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="JoePgh, post: 4284194, member: 1131"] I sense a certain amount of shifting of the goalposts in responses such as this, not with you specifically but with the general direction of this discussion. This thread started because a lot of Boneyarders were and still are saying that UConn does not have anyone in its front court with the physical size, strength, quickness, and appetite for physical play that is needed to beat SC. (Apparently it has enough to beat everyone else, including Stanford. Everyone seems to forget that in the semifinal game against Stanford, UConn won the rebounding battle against the "tallest team in the country" by 46-37, and tied in offensive rebounds. In that particular game, against some pretty physical rebounders, Aaliyah Edwards personally had 8 rebounds including 4 offensive rebounds.) When it was pointed out that Aaliyah is the same size as Morgan Tuck (who apparently provided adequate physical play and enough rebounds in 2015 and 2016), and is in fact a bit taller and quicker than Morgan and has undamaged knees, people either say that she isn't big enough since Boston is 6-5, or that times have changed since 2016 (which I greatly doubt). Or they just ignore Aaliyah entirely when they make these sweeping generalizations. Now you shift the argument to a different ground, by arguing about AE's mental mistakes. Does this mean that you are conceding that AE has all the requisite physical skills to deliver what UConn needs in the front court? If your point is that AE has the physical tools that are needed and simply needs development to minimize mental mistakes, then I agree with you. Because that means that it's quite unlikely that UConn will find anyone in the transfer portal who will deliver what UConn needs in the front court better than Aaliyah will. Beyond that, your comments about mental mistakes and missed layups apply mostly to the first part of the season, as do your comments about "regression". After about February, she was playing at least as well as she did at any point in her freshman year, and that level of play was very good. I would contend that she made major improvements in the area of reducing her foul-proneness, and also in developing and using her mid-range jump shot. I would say that AE is Answer #1 to the need for more physical play and rebounding among UConn's big players, and most likely Brady and Patterson are Answers #2 and #3. I don't see Amari or Dorka being top-flight rebounders against teams with strong front courts; I agree with those who say that they will be more like Liv than like Morgan Tuck or Stef Dolson. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Does UConn Need a Low-Post "Banger"?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom