FWIW only 1 championship, 2014, was in the AAC.Just proof what a great partner UConn is. They go to the AAC, win a couple of natty's and those doofuses yawn. UConn comes back to the Big East, wins a natty killing every outsider in their path. Yet they let their conference rivals get a few licks in just to prop up the league's profile. Big East is now the cool league. Done and done.
LOLOr do the NCAA tournament teams get an added benefit? Does winning increase your take?
It would be better if someone who actually knows answers this question.
I think that we were probably referring to women's championships as well here. My understanding is that they split the same wayFWIW only 1 championship, 2014, was in the AAC.
The American as an entity has only 2 titles for all sports. Both UConn.FWIW only 1 championship, 2014, was in the AAC.
Well that answers one question (although not the one I asked).From the article, the Big East conference is set to earn $30 million from the NCAA tournament this year.
March Madness 2023: Eliminated Early, SEC Nabs Tournament-High $34 Million
March Madness unit payouts will deliver tournament-high $34 million to SEC. The Big 12 ($32 million) is next, followed by the Big East ($30 million).www.sportico.com
Well that answers one question (although not the one I asked).
Each unit (which is one game) is worth 2 million bucks. So we contributed 12 million dollars to the Big East 30 million dollar haul.
That's 40% of the total. It sure seems like we should get more than 2.7 mil.
According to the article, the finals don't count as a unit. No explanation as to why. So, UConn earned $10M or 1/3rd of the BE total.Well that answers one question (although not the one I asked).
Each unit (which is one game) is worth 2 million bucks. So we contributed 12 million dollars to the Big East 30 million dollar haul.
That's 40% of the total. It sure seems like we should get more than 2.7 mil.