Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Bear11, post: 2610005, member: 7934"] I'm not spinning things, I'm stating facts. And having fewer losses than other teams is actually a very good argument for being a better team. Once again, EVERY metric and poll has Baylor as a one seed. If the committee ignores all those metrics, then they are admitting that the whole process is entirely arbitrary. Notre Dame would have an undeniable resume if they had a win over Louisville or UConn. They do not. They do have wins over a lot of good teams. Baylor does too, unless you are willing to admit that 3 wins over Texas and sweeping the Big 12 and Stanford are not good wins. I find it interesting that last year, Baylor was 7th in RPI and had a worse RPI SOS (despite playing a tougher nonconference schedule than this year, I don't really get this), yet there was little debate about getting a 1 seed. It seems like the committee is moving the goalposts a bit. [/QUOTE]