Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="MainefanSC, post: 3902249, member: 8576"] Let's see title IX was passed in June1972. That's almost 49 years. When you consider that a LARGE contingent of schools had no programs for women, at that time, tens of thousands of examples and massive [B]may not[/B] be much. When you go from nothing to something, all progress is relative. So, relatively speaking, the NCAA has a long way to go to have a situation where fairness is considered acceptable. 49 years!!!!!!! and we haven't arrived at fairness. I understand the men's programs generate $$$$$. I'm not foolish (some in my family may not agree with that statement), I'm not expecting equality yet. I'm certainly expecting fairness. The least that could be done is to provide necessities. I am guessing the NCAA has no idea what necessary is. I would venture a guess that athletic trainers would deem weights necessary. I would venture a guess that team nutrition is necessary. I'm wondering what the comfort level is, for the women. Are my sights set too high here? [/QUOTE]