Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="ctchamps, post: 2760849, member: 37"] Until I read this I thought KO should have taken any offer, if an offer was made, no matter how much less it was from his demand. However if JC’s contract is similar to KO’s it appears to me the university is playing with fire in its approach to KO because JC was not fired following the apr penalties. Seems to me KO can claim “prejudicial “ treatment and win not only the $10 million but seek damages over and above this amount. I’m basing this on the posters in this forum who claim KO will not get a div I coaching gig because he did not leave quietly. KO’s lawyers will have a field day over this. At least [USER=676]@whaler11[/USER] will get some satisfaction over this when DB gets fired because the boosters putting the squeeze on DB to pay zero (my conjecture) will not take the blame for their part in all of this. [/QUOTE]