I think you are correct. Bulletin board material for next year's game vs Maryland!Huh I didn't see that on Saturday but he absolutely punched him in the head.
Calling that a punch in the head is like calling our offense potent.
By any reasonable definition of the rules it was a personal foul. It wasn't Mike Tyson in his prime, but it slipped through the cracks. No excuse for fumbling, but he clearly hit him in the head.
I sometimes like Alanis Morrissette struggle with the definition of irony: Is it ironic that this board denies a blow to the head with video evidence, but because Steg's penalty isn't on tape it couldn't have happened?
By definition Steg's penalty happened because they called it.
Where I find fault in calling this a "blow" to the head is that it takes super slow motion to see that contact was made. His head turns the same time as the defender's left arm was beginning to strip the ball out. The head turn could easily have been as much a response to the ball starting to come out as the hand making contact to the head.
Yes, his hand hit his helmet. Calling it a "punch" is just silly, IMHO.
Ok, I watched it 4 more times. Yes, the head turned because of the contact.If you don't think its a penalty thats fine we can disagree but he turns his head because he got hit that is pretty obvious.
Ok, I watched it 4 more times. Yes, the head turned because of the contact.
But he's not a QB in the pocket, and this isn't the NFL. He's a runner with the ball 10+ yards downfield. The defender didn't grab the facemask. So I still don't understand why this would be a personal foul. For what?
Well you can't hit anyone in the head anywhere on the field.
Calling that a punch in the head is like calling our offense potent.