Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="8893, post: 2759725, member: 93"]
Definitely not easy because it is extremely rare to find a smoking gun in any case, so there needs to be enough circumstantial evidence from which a reasonable juror could reach that conclusion in order to avoid summary judgment, which is the name of the game in a lawsuit.  Not sure how that plays out in arbitration (which, btw, I am not certain is definitely the next step; I seem to recall some language suggesting that electing arbitration waives court action, which, to me, suggests that going straight to court is an option--one I would absolutely prefer if I was Ollie).  I don't agree that he would have to show that the agreement intended to allow NCAA violations; only that the University has allowed similar or worse with others who have similar contracts, that it otherwise treated these violations less than seriously, and/or that it was plotting to remove him based on performance before any of this came to light, etc.  The timeline would be very helpful in this respect.

You keep repeating that as if it is representative of something someone is thinking.  Who, exactly, do you believe is saying or even thinking that?  I'm certainly not.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach