Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CL82, post: 2759665, member: 44"] The claim, if I remember correctly, was the failure to give Ollie notice of UConn's intent to fire. (Loudermill notice.) In the most recent release of information, there was a throw line that AD Dave, gave Ollie written notice two days before he met with him. It's not what I do for a living, but I think that meets the Loudermill requirements. This issue is one of the little sub-dramas that largely got overlooked by the board. If the administration botched that, as Ollie's lawyers claimed, it would have been a major screw up. [/QUOTE]