Defense was not acceptable yesterday | The Boneyard

Defense was not acceptable yesterday

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
817
Reaction Score
1,144
We wouldve been blown out by a good team. We need to get back to the shop and work on getting out on shooters and preparing for dribble drive hand offs. I have to be on Ollie on this one--I dont think Uconn was prepared. Also shows just how important Brimah is.

I dont know if anyone knows this but we are #12 in the country in true FG% . If a Uconn team is 12 in offense we should be 10-0.
 

Silk31

Foot Stays on Gas
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
880
Reaction Score
2,415
The utter refusal to get out and defend the 3 point line was disgraceful. At a certain point it is pure laziness and that is what is the most unacceptable part of it. These guys were wide open from deep the whole game - how does this happen and how does KO and staff allow that to happen without in game adjustments.

If certain players aren't getting it done out there, then go down the bench and find a guy who will actually get out there and close out on shooters.

The lack of 3 ball guarding isn't a new issue either as we saw it cost us games vs Cuse and Gonzaga...you would think this should be a simple fix but apparently it is not
 
Joined
Dec 2, 2011
Messages
817
Reaction Score
1,144
The utter refusal to get out and defend the 3 point line was disgraceful. At a certain point it is pure laziness and that is what is the most unacceptable part of it. These guys were wide open from deep the whole game - how does this happen and how does KO and staff allow that to happen without in game adjustments.

If certain players aren't getting it done out there, then go down the bench and find a guy who will actually get out there and close out on shooters.

The lack of 3 ball guarding isn't a new issue either as we saw it cost us games vs Cuse and Gonzaga...you would think this should be a simple fix but apparently it is not

We cant hedge/help off our man without having the ability to get back. Were simply not getting back to the shooter. The intensity on that end is simply not there. A staple of Uconn is playing 40 minutes of hard D. It can be rectified. I dont mind the other team making long 2's --so over play the line and get over the screen /dont double the driver if you can get back to your man.
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
612
Reaction Score
1,414
I was at the game. Sure they made a TON of shots they shouldn't have (or at least it appeared that way in the stands). But at no point did I really think we were ever in danger of losing the game, even when we were down in the first half.. SURE the defense wasn't GREAT but I think we all overreacting a little bit.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,634
Reaction Score
25,667
In the postgame KO indicated that the team was well scouted and Gantz and Jahadi were known, so you can bet that the players knew what they were supposed to do, they just didn't. A big man deadly from 3 is tough because we are always hedging back for the rebound but you are correct in that without better D we have major problems. In our climb back in the Gonzaga game we proved that we have the defensive ability so I don't know what else to say.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
3,538
Reaction Score
10,183
KO gave a small post game interview and he seemed a little lost. That may be a harsh way to put it, but I don't blame him. There didn't seem to be any combination that would play defense. I'm not sure what KO is supposed to do in that situation.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
16,660
Reaction Score
32,855
I was at the game. Sure they made a TON of shots they shouldn't have (or at least it appeared that way in the stands). But at no point did I really think we were ever in danger of losing the game, even when we were down in the first half.. SURE the defense wasn't GREAT but I think we all overreacting a little bit.
I agree I kept saying we will win because of superior talent, but not on performance (particularly defensive).
 

August_West

Conscience do cost
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
51,356
Reaction Score
90,269
The defense it troubling because it is the same items being exploited no matter who the opponent. That frightens me quite a bit. This is not your usual UConn defensive team. Our offense is coming around nicely, the defense is troubling.
 

CTBasketball

Former Owner of the Pizza Thread
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
9,894
Reaction Score
32,790
We just don't have fundamentally sound defenders. Hard to play as a unit when you have 2-3 holes on defense.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,316
Reaction Score
23,569
I was at the game. Sure they made a TON of shots they shouldn't have (or at least it appeared that way in the stands). But at no point did I really think we were ever in danger of losing the game, even when we were down in the first half.. SURE the defense wasn't GREAT but I think we all overreacting a little bit.
If this was a one game anomaly I would agree but except for some stretches our D this year has been really bad. Wide open 3s and matador d to to the basket. A quinella that may cost us a tournament bid. This team has yet to show they can play hard, smart bb for 2 games in a row. 4 of the last 6 games opponents have shot over 45%. A quality D1 defensive team does not let a low major shoot 50% from the field like yesterday. It washed away most of the good we felt after the OS game. We have very little chance of winning at Texas if we play the same D we've been playing.

So a question to those more knowledgable than me. Is it all just lack of effort or is it our guys are not suited to the scheme?
 

August_West

Conscience do cost
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
51,356
Reaction Score
90,269
If this was a one game anomaly I would agree but except for some stretches our D this year has been really bad. Wide open 3s and matador d to to the basket. A quinella that may cost us a tournament bid. This team has yet to show they can play hard, smart bb for 2 games in a row. 4 of the last 6 games opponents have shot over 45%. A quality D1 defensive team does not let a low major shoot 50% from the field like yesterday. It washed away most of the good we felt after the OS game. We have very little chance of winning at Texas if we play the same D we've been playing.

So a question to those more knowledgable than me. Is it all just lack of effort or is it our guys are not suited to the scheme?
Both, but I believe it is more about not being suited to the scheme, in some case mentally, in some cases physically. For example Gibbs footspeed seems lacking on the defensive end. Hamilton is as bad a defender as he is great offensively and rebounding. Adams plays with energy but is prone to freshman mistakes (obviously) . Purvis is decent but not lock down. Enoch is totally lost defensively. Miller is an enigma. He should be a way better defender then he has been so far.

Effort helps overcome some of that, and we dont always see the full effort. But even when we do, we still have those flaws.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,745
Reaction Score
14,099
Once again the Board overreacts to a single game coming out of finals.
Traditionally a trap game.
This team has played a defense all year ,which is dependent on their Big Guy.
I would suspect ,if we were forced to play an extended time without him ,KO would come up with a defensive scheme that best utilized the players he has. Who knows maybe we will even plays some zone.
My only concerns right now are getting everyone healthy and CCSU.
 

Silk31

Foot Stays on Gas
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
880
Reaction Score
2,415
Once again the Board overreacts to a single game coming out of finals.
Traditionally a trap game.
This team has played a defense all year ,which is dependent on their Big Guy.
I would suspect ,if we were forced to play an extended time without him ,KO would come up with a defensive scheme that best utilized the players he has. Who knows maybe we will even plays some zone.
My only concerns right now are getting everyone healthy and CCSU.
This isn't an over reaction...no one was truly worried that we would lose this game at any point but when you see the same defensive lapses occur time and time again it is troubling to not see some type of improvement. Majority of defense is effort based...we aren't some mid major that can say that they just don't have the athleticism and talent to be a solid defensive unit. I don't expect us to be one of the better UConn defensive teams but there is no excuse to be below average.

Blown assignments, lack of communication and pure laziness have become a reoccurring theme so this hasn't been a one game type conclusion
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,316
Reaction Score
23,569
Once again the Board overreacts to a single game coming out of finals.
Traditionally a trap game.
This team has played a defense all year ,which is dependent on their Big Guy.
I would suspect ,if we were forced to play an extended time without him ,KO would come up with a defensive scheme that best utilized the players he has. Who knows maybe we will even plays some zone.
My only concerns right now are getting everyone healthy and CCSU.
When 4 out of the last 6 teams we've played shoot over 45% against us I don't think it's an overreaction.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,149
Reaction Score
8,314
Dare I say we are missing Tsam's on ball pressure? Gibbs is a major densive liability so far and I'm not crazy about his body language.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
698
Reaction Score
1,841
Dare I say we are missing Tsam's on ball pressure? Gibbs is a major densive liability so far and I'm not crazy about his body language.

Or Boat. He was the best defender we had on the ball. Plus he was good for a few steals. The only time we get steals now, is when the other team makes a bad pass.
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
1,032
Reaction Score
5,091
We are clearly missing Boat. We have gone 180 degrees from last year where we couldn't score but could defend. Very Strange flip.
 

Silk31

Foot Stays on Gas
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
880
Reaction Score
2,415
We are obviously better on the perimeter defensively a year ago with Boat and TSam to go along with Purvis. Purvis has been just fine this year but Gibbs being below average defender and Adams is a freshman. Jalen definitely shows the ability to eventually become a pretty good defender for us but there's plenty of room to grow for him on D.

It's not all on the perimeter guys though. Miller hasn't been as advertised (I recall a Bleacher Report article that touted him as the best Defensive Player...haven't seen any indication of that so far), Brimah still finds himself out of position and due to our guards getting beat off the dribble he has to rotate and help way too much. Hamilton plays about as much defense as his older brother Jordan did and it really was funny watching him get worked by that stocky lefty yesterday - it took him all game to realize he wanted to go left.

I know Gibbs and Hamilton will continue to be the defensive whipping boys this season but it's an overall team issue and if we were banking on those two anchoring our D then we never had a chance
 
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Messages
1,032
Reaction Score
5,091
We are obviously better on the perimeter defensively a year ago with Boat and TSam to go along with Purvis. Purvis has been just fine this year but Gibbs being below average defender and Adams is a freshman. Jalen definitely shows the ability to eventually become a pretty good defender for us but there's plenty of room to grow for him on D.

It's not all on the perimeter guys though. Miller hasn't been as advertised (I recall a Bleacher Report article that touted him as the best Defensive Player...haven't seen any indication of that so far), Brimah still finds himself out of position and due to our guards getting beat off the dribble he has to rotate and help way too much. Hamilton plays about as much defense as his older brother Jordan did and it really was funny watching him get worked by that stocky lefty yesterday - it took him all game to realize he wanted to go left.

I know Gibbs and Hamilton will continue to be the defensive whipping boys this season but it's an overall team issue and if we were banking on those two anchoring our D then we never had a chance
we were so spoiled with Kemba/Shabazz/Boat its hard not to notice the glaring differences in the defensive pressure we don't place on the opponents guards. I'm noticing that even the garbage teams we play seem to have fantastic ball movement on us.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
3,704
Reaction Score
11,778
I know Gibbs and Hamilton will continue to be the defensive whipping boys this season but it's an overall team issue and if we were banking on those two anchoring our D then we never had a chance

Because they are awful on-ball defenders. When someone gets beat off the dribble, it's almost always Gibbs or DHam's guy. It's a difficult dilemma as Adams, while potentially a very good defender, is prone freshman mistakes and without DHam we are a hideous offensive team. However, KO has to get them to at least try defensively. It's a pretty piss-poor effort most of the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
311
Guests online
2,186
Total visitors
2,497

Forum statistics

Threads
159,055
Messages
4,178,792
Members
10,050
Latest member
MTSuitsky


.
Top Bottom