DC interview with Warde Manuel

[businesslawyer]

Yale Bowl N

As far as I know the Yale bowl could still host a large crowd. I attended two games there last year and all of the benches appear to still be in place. If I remember right it was reported that the Fordham game could have been played there last year if needed. The only drawback to Yale bowl is parking. Shuttle buses are needed for big crowds, but putting up with that once every other year wouldn't be so bad. I'm only 5 miles away so it wouldn't bother me at all.

Can someone explain to me why Yale bowl is viewed as a nuetral site? People do realize that New Haven is by far the best city in CT and somewhat centrally located.

This is off topic but it is a darn shame that the UCONN campus didn't start and grow where Southern's campus is located. If UCONN's money were invested in the New Haven area that town would be like a little Boston. If only we could turn back the clock 100 years. UCONN D1 football would have started at least 10 years earlier too because the games would be at the Yale Bowl. Oh Well.

Yale Bowl and its environs do not have the infrastructure to host 60k events. The seating capacity, sure, but not enough parking, not enough access, and not enough hotel rooms. Could you play a game their once? Sure, you could. But to do it regularly wouldn't work. And, with new NFL stadiums within 30 miles of both the eastern and western state lines, there just isn't a need to.

 

[ZooCougar]

Isn't "full Nelson Muntz" redundant? I would think there is Nelson Muntz or not, with anything less than a full-Muntz not being a Muntz.

It's meant to be a play on that line from the movie "Tropic Thunder". "Everyone knows you never go full ". But yes, I could see how it could be redundant.

 

[businesslawyer]

It's meant to be a play on that line from the movie "Tropic Thunder". "Everyone knows you never go full ". But yes, I could see how it could be redundant.

Your line was funny. I guess my response wasn't based on your reply.

Oh well. Swing and a miss.

 

[ZooCougar]

Your line was funny. I guess my response wasn't based on your reply.

Oh well. Swing and a miss.

It flew over my head, because I was locked in a half nelson. (I get it now) Sometimes I miss dry humor.

 

[Jimmy Serrano]

I do not know, and neither does anyone here, what concessions it will take to schedule enough "big boys" out of conference that we can maintain relevance in a Big East that fewer now care about. Is is silly for any of us to be saying "this deal is acceptable" or "this deal isn't" unless we're at the negotiating table. Obviously, I'd like to have the best deals we can get.

What I am saying, however, is that I see no reason to believe we can maintain even our current level of relevance unless we are willing to make scheduling concessions out of conference. What the level of concession will have to be -- who knows.

It's a fair you make.

But.....if we're going to limit this board to discussions that we are all "in the know" about.....we might as well shut down the BY.

 

[metsfan2323]

Yale Bowl and its environs do not have the infrastructure to host 60k events. The seating capacity, sure, but not enough parking, not enough access, and not enough hotel rooms. Could you play a game their once? Sure, you could. But to do it regularly wouldn't work. And, with new NFL stadiums within 30 miles of both the eastern and western state lines, there just isn't a need to.

There were still large crowd games at the Yale Bowl in the 80's. Hotel space has probably gone up since then. The NY Giants played their home games there in 73 and 74 and I don't think "Access" has changed since then. It will be a tougher commute than the Rent, but a much easier commute then Giants Stadium.

 

[Wildgopher]

I don't understand why anyone would want to see a UConn game vs anybody at the Yale Bowl or Yankee Stadium. If We have a game around here that is not at the Rent, at least put it in a professional FOOTBALL stadium.

 

[FAIRTIDES]

Is the Yale Bowl viable for large crowds? I realize that it was built for large capacity, but hasn't it fallen into disrepair, and they only maintain it for the smaller crowds that it now gets?

I think Yale did a renovation, recently, that also reduced capacity.

 

[huskypantz]

I don't understand why anyone would want to see a UConn game vs anybody at the Yale Bowl or Yankee Stadium. If We have a game around here that is not at the Rent, at least put it in a professional FOOTBALL stadium.

I don't care to see a game at Yale Bowl. I'd be very interested in seeing a game in NYC at Yankee Stadium, much more so than a game in New Jersey (which we already have every other year). We also already play in professional stadiums against USF and Temple.

 

[mattp]

Expanding the Rent means bigger games against more desirable opponents. It means a Michigan type opponent every year, that increases sales in a way you can't measure in a 40,000 seat stadium.
.

what kind of leap did you take to figure that an expanded stadium means a Michigan type opponent every year? it can't hurt our chances but if you're expecting a 55k stadium to put a Michigan type team in Est Hartford every other year you're going to be very disappointed watching Buffalo and UMass in front of 15k empty seats.

the new reality is that no matter how many fans our stadium holds, games against BCS teams are going to be fewer and further between as they all increase their number of conference games. several teams, including Michigan, have basically said they're not playing any more away OOC games at all aside from ND.

 

[Dann]

-play umass every year. as they develop they will bring more fans. 5 years from now i bet that game gets a bit heated and we develop the rivalry back a bit and it will become a season opener ever year sell out rival etc...
-instead of a fcs, play army every year. its a small boost for the sos/rpi but noteworthy. they are close, we can make it special. sell more than the visitor section to them. allow them to put a couple thousands cadets on a group of busses and fill a section or 2 in the new part of the stadium(upper deck). that would be cool i think and would fill our place up easy. i bet that would be a great tailgating day also.

 

[FAIRTIDES]

Yale Bowl N

Yale Bowl and its environs do not have the infrastructure to host 60k events. The seating capacity, sure, but not enough parking, not enough access, and not enough hotel rooms. Could you play a game their once? Sure, you could. But to do it regularly wouldn't work. And, with new NFL stadiums within 30 miles of both the eastern and western state lines, there just isn't a need to.

True. I remember the "old" (just after the Calvin Hill/Brian Dowling) days when the Bowl was filled to capacity for Dartmouth, Princeton and Yale. Parking was literally find-a-place-in-a-field and walk forever. You knew you were getting close when the Tailgaters appeared.

 

[Husky68]

I do not know, and neither does anyone here, what concessions it will take to schedule enough "big boys" out of conference that we can maintain relevance in a Big East that fewer now care about. Is is silly for any of us to be saying "this deal is acceptable" or "this deal isn't" unless we're at the negotiating table. Obviously, I'd like to have the best deals we can get.

What I am saying, however, is that I see no reason to believe we can maintain even our current level of relevance unless we are willing to make scheduling concessions out of conference. What the level of concession will have to be -- who knows.

Dumb. You win against BS, SMU, LV, Cin, USF, Rutgirls, UCF, SDS, Houston, Navy, Mem and you raise your relevance.
It is silly for anyone not at the "relevance table" to determine what "will improve relevance" or not.
Sure has helped Marshall to play WV and Troy has really moved up with the rest of the Sunbelt guys for being fodder for the SEC.
Can't wait to see the pop Louisiana Monroe gets for starting the season playing Arkansas, Auburn and Baylor.
Beat BE teams and a NCS and Maryland and Uconn will be plenty relevant. That will be as good as VT who plays out of conference Cin, Pitt, Austin Pee and Bowling Green; and will again be considered relevant (at least before the 1st "unexpected" loss).
Uconn goes to undefeated Louisville as a 1 loss team to play on Nov 24th and Uconn will be plenty relevant - even without having beat ND at Yankee Stadium.

 

[ruskin]

Not fair to use "dumb" to dismiss a legitimate point out of hand. If UConn runs the table against that schedule they're still very likely on the outside in the 4-team scenario (would make an 8-team, tho). Yes, 12-0 vs. that sked raises relevance and gets you into a non-playoff BCS (or whatever they're calling it). But some, if not the majority, of the yahoos that are going to be on that committee are going to wonder where the 'name' teams are. Doesn't mean it's right, but that's the reality. And I don't think it's a given that BS SMU Hou and SDS are coming by any stretch so we better be preparing if they bail.
And that Nov. 24 scenario is only valid for one more season. If that was '14, unbeaten Louisville is out of the playoffs; their only noncons next season so far are Kentucky, FIU and Marshall. Good luck getting into the 4 team with that.

 

[FAIRTIDES]

I don't understand why anyone would want to see a UConn game vs anybody at the Yale Bowl or Yankee Stadium. If We have a game around here that is not at the Rent, at least put it in a professional FOOTBALL stadium.

What we "want" and what is available to us are distinctly different. UCONN football is at a very tenuous place as it relates to gaining national prominence. Given the money already invested, less than national recognition would be a disaster. It will take playing and, occasionally, beating a Texas/Oklahoma/Florida/Ohio State/Southern Cal/etc. At this point playing big-boy teams might require UCONN living with less favorable conditions (like neutral sites). Right now, UCONN will lose any attempt to make OOC scheduling into a "biggest male organ" contest.

As to "why Yankee Stadium?" As it relates to sports in metro-NYC, there are two venues considered "hallowed" ground; Madison Square Garden and, as much as it pains me, Yankee Stadium. Yankee Stadium has hosted some very famous college football games, mostly involving ND and a Service Academy. Yankee Stadium (and MSG) is Broadway. Citi Field, The Meadowlands, Gillette? Off Broadway, at least, for college football.

 

[Dann]

were going to win the whole dam thing this year so stop worrying about it.

 

[whaler11]

Yale Bowl isn't the right venue and it's doubtful anyone else would want to play there. Yankee Stadium gives a novelty factor and better train access from Metro North to haul our drunk rear ends to the game.

 

[Palatine]

Yankee Stadium seats 52,000 for football. That's smaller than an expanded Rentschler field which is designed for 55,000.

Next.

 

[pj]

Yankee Stadium works location wise. A game at Gillette might get fewer people than one at the Rent; Boston isn't into college football and the local Providence/Worcestor/New Bedford/Brockton folks aren't UConn fans. On a Saturday New York is more accessible to Connecticut fans than Foxborough, and it's the recruiting ground we need to win, so there's extra benefit to being there. Meadowlands is farther away and across the Hudson / off subway. Might have value if we're competing in New Jersey too but at the moment New York is much more open to us.

I don't think seating / ticket gate is the main issue. The attraction is media attention in NYC.

 

[Waquoit]

-play umass every year. as they develop they will bring more fans.

UMass can go screw. After all the trash they talked about UConn over the years why should we help them build their program? Bad enough The Rent is closer to their campus than their home field is.

 

[whaler11]

Yankee Stadium seats 52,000 for football. That's smaller than an expanded Rentschler field which is designed for 55,000.

Next.

Well hopefully you tell us how the games played in an imaginary stadium in your head play out. I have no idea why a neutral site game is such a big deal to some of you. Look at the first few weeks of the season there are plenty of huge schools playing neutral site games all over the country.

 

[Dann]

UMass can go screw. After all the trash they talked about UConn over the years why should we help them build their program? Bad enough The Rent is closer to their campus than their home field is.

Ok u can play buff or wm every year in front of 35 k and illplay umass in front of 55 k with a renew bball rival and them forever being stuck lower than us because we do the bcu thing to them to get back at that state. Fans get more hate built up and its a good rival game. They are close and eventually it will sell out quick. New england needs this type of thing to gain cf interest from the pop. Bcu didnt do it. They willsuffer 4 it.

 

[whaler11]

NC State and TN - Atlanta
Navy and ND - Dublin
Clemson and Auburn - Atlanta
Alabama and Michigan - Dallas

I guess it's all stadium seating capacity - no other reason to play neutral site games.

 

[pj]

NC State and TN - Atlanta
Navy and ND - Dublin
Clemson and Auburn - Atlanta
Alabama and Michigan - Dallas

I guess it's all stadium seating capacity - no other reason to play neutral site games.

No. Aviva Stadium in Dublin seats 51,700. Seating has nothing to do with it, this is an excuse for a TV spectacle. Dublin and the exotic architecture of Aviva makes a better backdrop for CBS.

The ACC-SEC matchups in Atlanta are not about the stadium, but about building interest in the largest TV market east of Dallas in their collective footprint, a city both conferences contest. http://www.stationindex.com/tv/tv-markets.

 

[huskymedic]

what kind of leap did you take to figure that an expanded stadium means a Michigan type opponent every year? it can't hurt our chances but if you're expecting a 55k stadium to put a Michigan type team in Est Hartford every other year you're going to be very disappointed watching Buffalo and UMass in front of 15k empty seats.

the new reality is that no matter how many fans our stadium holds, games against BCS teams are going to be fewer and further between as they all increase their number of conference games. several teams, including Michigan, have basically said they're not playing any more away OOC games at all aside from ND.

Ummm - Michigan just signed a home and home w/ Utah that has Michigan going to Rice-Eccles Stadium (capacity 46k +/-) for a Thursday night game no less. Now, would that happen if the Utes were still part of the MWC instead of PAC pick a number, I'm not sure but times are changing regarding scheduling. I think everything is on the table.

 

[Palatine]

Well hopefully you tell us how the games played in an imaginary stadium in your head play out. I have no idea why a neutral site game is such a big deal to some of you. Look at the first few weeks of the season there are plenty of huge schools playing neutral site games all over the country.

Because I like my season tickets where they are. I paid a donation and for the tickets. If you're moving the quality opponents out o the Rent, why buy season tickets?

 

[whaler11]

No. Aviva Stadium in Dublin seats 51,700. Seating has nothing to do with it, this is an excuse for a TV spectacle. Dublin and the exotic architecture of Aviva makes a better backdrop for CBS.

The ACC-SEC matchups in Atlanta are not about the stadium, but about building interest in the largest TV market east of Dallas in their collective footprint, a city both conferences contest. http://www.stationindex.com/tv/tv-markets.

No shit. That is what I was saying. People play neutral site games for reasons other than the stadiums are bigger. If Michigan and Alabama can - so can UConn.

 

[ruskin]

Because I like my season tickets where they are. I paid a donation and for the tickets. If you're moving the quality opponents out o the Rent, why buy season tickets?

I'm also paying the donation/tickets for four great seats in a great section at the Rent. I also want what's best for the program. I don't consider making a 180-mile round trip once every two years a Lewis & Clark expedition. Save yourself the cash and save us the pontificating.