Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 2467206, member: 3535"] You brought it up on here as if it was relevant. I'm only going by what you have said. And I've said several times on this thread that he shouldn't have mentioned it if he did. So which is it? Did he bring it up denigrating the win by saying Miss State was drained or not? If he brought it up-- isn't that "reliving it?" And it is ""denigrating." How cna you say that he isn't "depreciating" their win? As far as Miss State vs USC- didn't USC beat them during the season 2 previous times? If you are going to use that "UCONN and Baylor were on par," then why not use USC and Miss State prior games? So again why even make the irrelevant passing comment if you are Greenberg? There is no point to mention it - even in passing. And as post here on the boneyard, and maybe other sites - ofc anyone can post opinions. So to your comment "let them" knock UCONN for their 1st title. Sure. I agree. But I don't have to like the other person's opinion/ or think they are right, do I? Do the Tennesse fans or past coaching staff have to like the mention of 1997 beign "tainted?" How about the Notre Dame fan have to like hearing about UCONN's injuries during their 2001 title? It's okay to post - coaches and fans that we don't like it, right? [/QUOTE]