BU just went from America East to the Patriot League. They voluntarily took a step down to a non-scholarship league.
So, I doubt the A-10 is on the horn.
Not to mention that this will have no impact on BU's 1 major, money making sport, Hockey, which is in Hockey East.That's not a step down. Patriot League is better than Am East. And they plan to STILL give scholarships in bball.
Not to mention that this will have no impact on BU's 1 major, money making sport, Hockey, which is in Hockey East.
Best thing BU ever did was drop football. It stabilized the entire athletic department. Academically, it's been rising up the charts faster than any school I can think of.
That's not a step down. Patriot League is better than Am East. And they plan to STILL give scholarships in bball.
It's not a step up to join a conference where significant number of schools don't give out scholarships. Ever.
Even if those teams are more successful head to head, year in and year out, with the conference you left?
And herein lies the difference between a scholarship and a grant-in-aid from schools like Bucknell.
Apparently, the athletes see very little difference between the two, and given the choice, they go to Patriot League schools over American East Schools.
Bucknell, American and Lehigh are at a totally different level than the rest of the Patriot League (in basketball and wrestling only). The rest is complete unmitigated crap. Navy, Army (with all due respect to both for their greater mission), Holy Cross, Lafayette...these are meaningless schools who add nothing to Division I in nearly every sport.
You're confusing BU's academic rise with them being a good fit for a good basketball conference- they aren't, they never have been, they never will be.
I remember when BU announced it was dropping football. I think it was the next game, they played in Storrs and the entire team work electrical tape over their BU logo’s. Everyone felt bad for the team.
BU basically made a decision 20 years ago to, outside of hockey, drop-out of the money war that major college athletics have become. Their competitive focus since then has been on the two schools across the Charles on an academic basis – Harvard and MIT. Northeastern has since followed suit; but, they are not aiming to compete with that pair. Overall, I got my MBA from BU and found the school to be very over-rated with tuition and ego’s of an Ivy League school without the pedigree of one.
When I think of BU I think of a money-making institution with educational and research functions on the side. Their large foreign student population is there for profitability reasons. Their research is there for the overhead income; their medical school benefits by being in Boston with a number of prestigious hospitals / medical schools -- sort of a poor man's Harvard, you get to rub shoulders with more prestigious folks. I'm not surprised they dropped sports they weren't competitive in.
Not that this is a dumb decision, and you could say much the same about Harvard, which is more or less a hedge fund and a prestige-selling business with a university on the side.
ahem ... I think the University of Maryland - Baltimore County has a bright future. It has a dynamic President and really not what you are portraying. They have a chance, with consistent focus and drive, to be a solid second school in an important state. Who else? Towson???
The CAA rejection was a bad idea in hindsight. At the time, the explanation was the travel costs would be very high, as the league would be BU, Northeastern, then a bunch of teams primarily located in Virginia. I don't know how good of a reason or not that was, but competitively, it was a bad decision.Thanks for setting me straight on the scholarship situation for basketball.
Competition-wise, turning down the CAA was pretty dumb. Even the bargain-basement version of the CAA is better than the PL or AE basketball-wise. There's other factors at play here, for BU, I suppose.