Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Danny's move of the night.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Hans Sprungfeld, post: 4471768, member: 181"] I get a little suspicious when a post exhibits shifts in verb forms and pronouns in such a casually flexible manner. Your first paragraph consisted of 4 sentences anchored in the passive verb "to be," with no defined subject. But then the last sentence closed with, "...you hope..." I do? I don't necessarily hope what you offered, but it sounds as though you do. Paragraph 2 gets closer to identifying your writing as your personal take, but slips back into passive voice, before closing with the conclusion, "We'd be killing him if..." I don't know if that's true; I generally limit my killing to 'convenience eliminations' of bugs in the wrong place at the wrong time. But there's safety in numbers and "we" therefore can 'sound' better, and there's less personal accountability with the passive verb form, therefore many choose it as a safer, softer way to present a strong opinion. At the time, I didn't form an opinion that it was a designed play. I wondered about the shot. Because it went in, it worked and is recorded as the kickoff to a dominant game close. I admit that it could have gone differently. I do note that I'd already txted to my sister that Adama had gone to the hoop from both sides, used both shooting hands, used the backboard more, still displays a soft touch on baskets that don't go off the glass, has improved his FG & FT shooting, has shown power & quickness & finesse, had a nice assist, is dunking more, has been capable on breakaways, and made a mid-range shot. I noted all of these as improvements in his game. We've had at least one thread that discussed the need for or lack of a dominant, take-the-game over player. I witnessed such a performance on Saturday, even though I see that the team is developing well without being star-dominant. For now, I'm happy to see so many possibilities. If the team reverts to poorly-chosen shots on a widespread basis, I'll reconsider my opinion. For now, I liked seeing such a powerful final 10 minutes. This is a well-known skill of his. I'd love to see it encouraged, if for no other reason than to build confidence in Tristen that he is the best on the team at this. Additional benefits are points scored via FT shooting, modeling his success for teammates, still retaining the options to dump-off or kickout. Once he's drawing fouls, the team success will grow. Go to the basket please. EDIT: Ugh, this post is way too overstuffed and reflects post-surgery followup-evaluation (all good) brain. I don't disagree with what I wrote. I just don't have the whatever to edit. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Men's Basketball Forum
Danny's move of the night.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom