Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Creme Bracketology 3/4
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="maccca3232, post: 3066449, member: 7923"] I have read posters mention that the Committee values 'quality' wins over 'bad' losses but a problem with that ethos, while understandable, is the fact that not all teams get the same amount of opportunities to achieve 'quality' wins. Obviously that them favors bubble teams in P5 conferences. I created a file analyzing the performances of teams based on the teams [I]they[/I] actually played against the expected performance for each game based on ratings from RPI (Real Time RPI), Her Hoops Stats Rating and Massey and then created an average rating. Notes: The results were taken from Her Hoops Data and include only Division I games. If you beat the lowest ranked team you get no benefit similarity if you lose to the best team you get no penalty. It is easy to add additional ratings if requested. I found it interesting that Tennessee was only the fifth worst rated At-Large bid (worst was Buffalo. Results Rank 53rd). Does anyone believe that Tennessee (Results Rank 43rd) is more worthy of an At-Large bid then say Ohio (Results Rank 39th). [ATTACH=full]40610[/ATTACH] If you exclude Tennessee's losses to Top 25 RPI (0-6) and compare: Ohio is 7-4 vs RPI Top 100 and 16-0 vs Non RPI Top 100 (23-4 combined) [U]Best Wins:[/U] Central Mich. (26) Buffalo (32) Lamar University (52) American (78) Purdue (87) Kent St. (89) x 2 [U]Losses:[/U] H Central Mich. (26) H Buffalo (32) H Miami OH (46) A Toledo (83) Tennessee is 7-3 vs Top 100 and 11-2 vs Non RPI Top 100 (18-5 combined) [U]Best Wins:[/U] Texas (27) Missouri (28) Auburn (48) x 2 Clemson (55) Belmont (58) LSU (70) [U]Losses:[/U] H Missouri (28) H Arkansas (96) A Georgia (100) A Alabama (153) H Vanderbilt (197) Are Tennessee's wins that much better that they override their much worse losses? Revised: Edited report to adjust the weight of losses, so that a 'good' loss adds small benefit and a 'bad' win subtracts small benefit. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,408
Messages
4,394,655
Members
10,208
Latest member
jskwrite
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Creme Bracketology 3/4
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom