Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Icehawk, post: 4224625, member: 10615"] Considering they played a team who has a strong gameplan proven to work and delivered a "C" game... this wasn't as terrible as I thought it was going to be when we were down double digits and injuries flying. The only major complaint I have is not changing up coverage with 4mins or so to go on Kalk, by that point it was clear he was beating Sanogo at will - either double up or have Sanogo stop sagging off him. Hurley has been more dynamic this season but it's like he's got a limit per game. We've got two distinct play styles - one where Sanogo dominates the paint and we feed him and one without him on the floor with a lot more ball movement, sometimes one works better than the other. Today I think going to the more alternate lineups (Whaley, Cole, Polley, AJ, Martin for ex) might have worked better since Sanogo was locked up on the offensive end and getting punished on D at the end. It just seems like Dan Hurley is married to the idea of sticking to "Plan A - Sanogo Feasts" regardless of what's happening unless Sanogo gets in early foul trouble. Our Plan B\Small Ball is just as strong IMO depending on the matchup and we saw that recently. Overall though we just came off the Nova win and then a blowout with mediocre play against GT, even if it wasn't Creighton I think a loss was a high percentage probability. It's all good, let's go for a run in the BET and more importantly in the Nats. Hoping none of the injuries are serious, especially Hawkins he didn't look too hot after pancaking into the human wall. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach