- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 91,038
- Reaction Score
- 347,573
There's an extent to which recent athletic success boosts a school, especially in applications, but only to a point. It's helpful when it's schools people haven't heard of (i.e. George Mason in the final four) gaining recognition and thus boosting applications, but it has minimal influence at this point--we already have name recognition. I don't think there's a strong correlation between athletic success and academic prestige...if so, wouldn't Alabama be a great school? Kentucky? Kansas? Wouldn't Rutgers going to the B1G come with a massive increase in their US News Rankings over the past several years? None of these things are the case.
Two of the top three public universities in the country have pretty pedestrian athletic departments--UVA and Cal Berkeley. University of Florida, who was once in our ballpark in US News rankings, is now the #9 public school in a time where their basketball and football programs are irrelevant compared to the Noah/Tebow years.
Also with UConn basketball not seeing the success it has the past few years -- the university has seen record number of applications, and university says they've had the most geographically diverse class as well. Agree with to a point helping a school get a short term boost, athletics plays a role, but think UConn has already hit that level of recognition, and don't think lack of success of the BB team have much impact on applications
I guess us "dolts" didn't realize that we are all required to have the same opinion on KO as you.A must read for the dolts who think the buyout for KO is prohibitive or want to give him one more year.
Fire him tomorrow!!!!I guess us "dolts" didn't realize that we are all required to have the same opinion on KO as you.
#2 UVA basketball says hiTwo of the top three public universities in the country have pretty pedestrian athletic departments--UVA and Cal Berkeley. University of Florida, who was once in our ballpark in US News rankings, is now the #9 public school in a time where their basketball and football programs are irrelevant compared to the Noah/Tebow years.
I’d give him another season.Fire him tomorrow!!!!
It went from far and away the best CT paper to the worst. And that’s saying something because the bar is pretty low right now.I can’t believe I spent 3 years of my life getting up at 5AM to deliver the Courant.
The rate these papers are going it will
be startling if any of them survive 5-10
years.
It went from far and away the best CT paper to the worst. And that’s saying something because the bar is pretty low right now.
I’d give him another season.
If you mean turning around his shot off the ninth tee into the 1st fairway, yes absolutely.I am sure Ollie can turn this thing around.
There's an extent to which recent athletic success boosts a school, especially in applications, but only to a point. It's helpful when it's schools people haven't heard of (i.e. George Mason in the final four) gaining recognition and thus boosting applications, but it has minimal influence at this point--we already have name recognition. I don't think there's a strong correlation between athletic success and academic prestige...if so, wouldn't Alabama be a great school? Kentucky? Kansas? Wouldn't Rutgers going to the B1G come with a massive increase in their US News Rankings over the past several years? None of these things are the case.
Two of the top three public universities in the country have pretty pedestrian athletic departments--UVA and Cal Berkeley. University of Florida, who was once in our ballpark in US News rankings, is now the #9 public school in a time where their basketball and football programs are irrelevant compared to the Noah/Tebow years.
I can’t believe I spent 3 years of my life getting up at 5AM to deliver the Courant.
The rate these papers are going it will
be startling if any of them survive 5-10
years.
Florida is a huge state and the comparisons are not relevant. For a New England public university, it's incredibly valuable. That's why advertisers spend millions for 60 seconds to sell their products on national TV.There's an extent to which recent athletic success boosts a school, especially in applications, but only to a point. It's helpful when it's schools people haven't heard of (i.e. George Mason in the final four) gaining recognition and thus boosting applications, but it has minimal influence at this point--we already have name recognition. I don't think there's a strong correlation between athletic success and academic prestige...if so, wouldn't Alabama be a great school? Kentucky? Kansas? Wouldn't Rutgers going to the B1G come with a massive increase in their US News Rankings over the past several years? None of these things are the case.
Two of the top three public universities in the country have pretty pedestrian athletic departments--UVA and Cal Berkeley. University of Florida, who was once in our ballpark in US News rankings, is now the #9 public school in a time where their basketball and football programs are irrelevant compared to the Noah/Tebow years.
This part was...yikes. Middle school science fair type research being put in.
3.) Student pride and alumni donations
Attend a game or watch one on television, and you'll see that the student section isn't packed like it used to be. Who could blame them? Top opponents would ostensibly be the biggest draws, but the team has gone 2-17 the past four seasons against top-25 ranked teams.
A study from the National Bureau of Economic Research found a correlation between athletic success and alumni donations.