Could this really be the end? | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Could this really be the end?

Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
I can pretty much guarantee you that Geno is not reading these posts-Geno doesn't do crazy!

come on............... he must take a peek now and again just to have a laugh...........
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
Absolutely amazing!!!!! We're doomed because a recruit committed to UT. I cannot put my amazement into words. It's beyond explanation. For those (or maybe it's just the one) who think it's "the end", does harikari mean anything to you?
I get it WE ARE DOOMED!! When Uconn gets to play U of T in 2020--We Are Doomed. Stacked, just stacked up with talent, and what does Uconn have to look forward to ??? Doomed, just Doomed.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2015
Messages
11,335
Reaction Score
25,045
I can pretty much guarantee you that Geno is not reading these posts-Geno doesn't do crazy!

As past comments from Geno tend to indicate either he is reading or someone is reading the comments to him. Some commens I admit are general but once in a while he is more specific.
Admittedly, Geno has so much better things to do and so do we, but we ain't doing em.
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
I can think of two:
2015 - Megan Gustafson - ESPN #80
2016 - Ruthy Hebard - ESPN #40
Both are good/great players for their respective teams.
I could also add several more post players to the list but here is the thing: UCONN is extremely demanding of its post players. @BobbyJ just gave us the example of Natalie Butler and I think Hebard and Gustafson would fall in the same category-Good player for other teams-limited impact at UCONN. Another example that comes to mind is Kiah Stokes.
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
2,814
Reaction Score
7,100
As past comments from Geno tend to indicate either he is reading or someone is reading the comments to him. Some commens I admit are general but once in a while he is more specific.
Admittedly, Geno has so much better things to do and so do we, but we ain't doing em.

He definitely reads these posts. he has mentioned them before. He made a comment saying something like(don't quote me exact percentages) 20% of the people really know basketball and have a good idea whats going with the team and the other 80% are so clueless it is laughable.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
He definitely reads these posts. he has mentioned them before. He made a comment saying something like(don't quote me exact percentages) 20% of the people really know basketball and have a good idea whats going with the team and the other 80% are so clueless it is laughable.

Yeah..........................nice to be part of the 20%........................:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
2,814
Reaction Score
7,100
Both are good/great players for their respective teams.
I could also add several more post players to the list but here is the thing: UCONN is extremely demanding of its post players. @BobbyJ just gave us the example of Natalie Butler and I think Hebard and Gustafson would fall in the same category-Good player for other teams-limited impact at UCONN. Another example that comes to mind is Kiah Stokes.

I absolutely agree with that. At UConn, as a post you have to be able to run the floor, rebound on both ends of the court, be a great help defender, be a floor general on defense calling out screens, you have to be able to move without the ball and not just set up on the blocks, be a great passer(especially from the high post), be a great screener, etc.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
Both are good/great players for their respective teams.
I could also add several more post players to the list but here is the thing: UCONN is extremely demanding of its post players. @BobbyJ just gave us the example of Natalie Butler and I think Hebard and Gustafson would fall in the same category-Good player for other teams-limited impact at UCONN. Another example that comes to mind is Kiah Stokes.

I think Hebard would be pretty effective in UConn's system.............not an outside shooter but she's incredibly efficient within 12 feet of the basket and has thrived against excellent competition............
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
I absolutely agree with that. At UConn, as a post you have to be able to run the floor, rebound on both ends of the court, be a great help defender, be a floor general on defense calling out screens, you have to be able to move without the ball and not just set up on the blocks, be a great passer(especially from the high post), be a great screener, etc.
Exactly. The only thing I would add, which was Kiah Stokes downfall, is a UCONN post has to be consistent offensive threat while on the floor.
 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
I think Hebard would be pretty effective in UConn's system...not an outside shooter but she's incredibly efficient within 12 feet of the basket and has thrived against excellent competition..
Ruthie had 22 assist in 37 games for Oregon last year. That would simply not cut it in the UCONN offense. See @TitleTown post of what is required of a UCONN post.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
Exactly. The only thing I would add, which was Kiah Stokes downfall, is a UCONN post has to be consistent offensive threat while on the floor.

if I remember correctly she missed a bunch of sitters but perhaps the best shot blocker I've ever seen
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
Ruthie had 22 assist in 37 games for Oregon last year. That would simply not cut it in the UCONN offense. See @TitleTown post of what is required of a UCONN post.

true but there's is a totally guard oriented offense where her sole function was to post up.............once she gets the ball it's not leaving her hands, it's going in the basket.........

 

CocoHusky

1,000,001 BY points
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
17,208
Reaction Score
73,885
true but there's is a totally guard oriented offense where her sole function was to post up...once she gets the ball it's not leaving her hands, it's going in the basket....

Right which is why I said she was a good/great player for that team. UCONN is not about that life where a player gets to only do the things she is good at.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
Right which is why I said she was a good/great player for that team. UCONN is not about that life where a player gets to only do the things she is good at.

well I know it's a moot point but just because she's not asked to pass doesn't mean she's not capable of doing it.............if Hebard transferred to UConn would you be unhappy? I'd be thrilled..............
 
Joined
Mar 8, 2016
Messages
3,734
Reaction Score
15,178
I absolutely agree with that. At UConn, as a post you have to be able to run the floor, rebound on both ends of the court, be a great help defender, be a floor general on defense calling out screens, you have to be able to move without the ball and not just set up on the blocks, be a great passer(especially from the high post), be a great screener, etc.
Geno is a great coach and would likely be happy to evolve his system as needed if it helped the team. Don't agree with the examples some give such as Butler (she came in with a broken thumb and couldn't hold onto the ball) and Stokes (totally shut down bigs of top teams as needed-solid pro). Give UConn a strong rebounder, good defender, solid offense inside paint - yes, Geno happy to make her into top draft choice and record more wins.
 
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
636
Reaction Score
1,196
Having followed the various responses I can see that the Thread is a bit deceptive- even though there is an incitement on the part of one or two set question marks about how the future might look.
Someone should post something on big-post players and Uconn. It is clearly at the center of what some people are diagnosing (with a strong conviction) as our problem in the past two years and us going forward. I would be interested in seeing a well fleshed out argument for this-- why are they not coming, and what would the difference be. After all, the last 2-years went well. The last 2- afinal4 games came down to desperation shots? individual play? game plan?
Why do we have to have a big to be competitive? What is missing?
 

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
16,734
Reaction Score
147,325
Having followed the various responses I can see that the Thread is a bit deceptive- even though there is an incitement on the part of one or two set question marks about how the future might look.
Someone should post something on big-post players and Uconn. It is clearly at the center of what some people are diagnosing (with a strong conviction) as our problem in the past two years and us going forward. I would be interested in seeing a well fleshed out argument for this-- why are they not coming, and what would the difference be. After all, the last 2-years went well. The last 2- afinal4 games came down to desperation shots? individual play? game plan?
Why do we have to have a big to be competitive? What is missing?
Keeping it simple. The primary reason UConn lost out on Wilson, Cox & C Collier was geography. They all decided to stay home. Sincerely hope Boston does the same.

Wilson’s final choice came down to UConn and SC. Had she decided on UConn, the Huskies would be coming off their 6th straight national championship.
 
Joined
Jan 30, 2017
Messages
3,041
Reaction Score
14,436
Clearly Geno has had enough of hearing "Is UConn bad for WCBB", now he's working on the remedy, let ND be bad for WCBB for awhile! :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
2,243
Reaction Score
5,794
Geno is a great coach and would likely be happy to evolve his system as needed if it helped the team. Don't agree with the examples some give such as Butler (she came in with a broken thumb and couldn't hold onto the ball) and Stokes (totally shut down bigs of top teams as needed-solid pro). Give UConn a strong rebounder, good defender, solid offense inside paint - yes, Geno happy to make her into top draft choice and record more wins.
His offensive and defensive philosophies are just one aspect of his overall basketball philosophy. Adapting his offense or defense in respect to the individual skills he has to work with was already incorporated with in that philosophy. A successful system transcends the individual skills of an player at any position. What made Uconn dominant for all these years was not totally dependent on any individual players skill set. No it was the total program dynamic that created consistently dominant teams. .

It would be interesting to explore the entire dynamic that created the Uconn dynasty in depth on a separate thread.
 
Last edited:

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
28,779
Reaction Score
53,000
Didn't Hebard have a stretch of games where she hit about 30 consecutive FGs? Who needs to pass the ball when you never miss? Her FG accuracy last season was along the line of Collier's soph season.


To answer my own question, she set a NCAA record w/ 33 made shots in a row. Think about that for a minute. Most of them were from point blank range, but contested, plus she had to get position deep in the post when every team knew exactly what she was trying to do, but couldn't stop her from doing it. Maybe she wouldn't totally suck if she played at UConn?
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,637
Reaction Score
44,539
Didn't Hebard have a stretch of games where she hit about 30 consecutive FGs? Who needs to pass the ball when you never miss? Her FG accuracy last season was along the line of Collier's soph season.


To answer my own question, she set a NCAA record w/ 33 made shots in a row. Think about that for a minute. Most of them were from point blank range, but contested, plus she had to get position deep in the post when every team knew exactly what she was trying to do, but couldn't stop her from doing it. Maybe she wouldn't totally suck if she played at UConn?

..........the idea of an almost automatic basket when you need one or the double team that such a player guarantees can work wonders in close games..........hopefully Ms Boston will remind us of that next year.......
 
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
217
Reaction Score
650
Having followed the various responses I can see that the Thread is a bit deceptive- even though there is an incitement on the part of one or two set question marks about how the future might look.
Someone should post something on big-post players and Uconn. It is clearly at the center of what some people are diagnosing (with a strong conviction) as our problem in the past two years and us going forward. I would be interested in seeing a well fleshed out argument for this-- why are they not coming, and what would the difference be. After all, the last 2-years went well. The last 2- afinal4 games came down to desperation shots? individual play? game plan?
Why do we have to have a big to be competitive? What is missing?
My assessment.... most replies about the impact of the lack of a quality big on the team are about offense . I believe the impact has been on the defense. UCONN has not had a shot blocker in the lane since Stewie. If you play a switching defense because your guards cannot stop penetration, you need a big plugging up the lane. The last two years losses were not due to last second shots as much as giving up too many points during the whole game.
 
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Messages
2,243
Reaction Score
5,794
It all boils down to a matter of supply and demand. The supply of big girls was never that vast. When one adds the fact that the number of the type of players willing to put in the commitment and effort,required from Geno, has been decreasing, it makes it harder still. Also the increase of quality coaches in WCBB has resulted in the subsequent increase of quality programs for players to chose from. For a time it was a given that Geno had his choice of almost every player he wanted. Not only have the options increased for the players, but due to the changing attitude of women players, it decreased they the number of available players who would fit UConn standards. That being defined as players who bought into the system and were willing to give the effort that was required.

The present trend portends a change in the type of WCBB players available and that does not bode well for the continuation of a system that created consistency of excellence.
 

Online statistics

Members online
530
Guests online
3,882
Total visitors
4,412

Forum statistics

Threads
155,775
Messages
4,031,226
Members
9,864
Latest member
Sad Tiger


Top Bottom