Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Football Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Comparing the Starting Five: 2016-17 vs. 2013-14
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="connie, post: 2320164, member: 7882"] “16-17” and “13-14” refers to the starters, not the entire team. [ATTACH=full]24655[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]24656[/ATTACH] [B][U]Minutes[/U][/B] The 13-14 starters were mules. All but KML started in all 40 games. Four of the Five starters played in at least 75% of every minute of every game of the season. Even adjusted for fewer games played, the 16-17 starters did not play more minutes. I found this surprising given the lack of a bench in 16-17; only Butler and Crystal Dangerfield subbed regularly. However, the 13-14 team also had a short bench, with Stokes, Chong and Banks rotating in and out. Tuck only played in 8 games due to injuries. [B][U]Shooting: FG, 3PG, FT, Pts.[/U][/B] 14-15 tended to have higher absolute numbers in several areas. This is to be expected given 3 additional games and heavy minutes. Adjusted for that, 16-17 numbers are higher or better in every category. Almost as many FGM on far fewer FGA. More 3FG on fewer attempts, even without adjusting. More trips to the line. More FTs made. Higher FG%. Higher 3FP%. Higher FT%. Advantage: 16-17. [B][U]Rebounds[/U][/B] The 13-14 starters outrebounded the 16-17 starters, though the latter had slightly more ORebs when adjusted for minutes. Otherwise, it appears 13-14 starters had more balanced all-around rebounding on both ends. Fewest total Rebs by a starter was Moriah’s 136, followed by Hartley’s 144. By comparison, 16-17 shows Chong, Nurse, and KLS with 104, 57, 143. Advantage: 13-14. [B][U]Assists[/U][/B] The starters are even here, once adjusted for minutes. This is a bit of a surprise in light of the fact that the 16-17 [I]team[/I] broke assist records. With one exception on each group (KML; Phees), every starter averaged more than 3 assists per game. Advantage: none. [B][U]Turnovers[/U][/B] 13-14 starters turned the ball over considerable more than the 16-17 starters. Adjusted for minutes, 13-14 had about 45 more TOs on the year, or a little more than 1 per game. Advantage: 16-17. [B][U]Steals[/U][/B] Again, 16-17 starters had better numbers, in absolute terms and adjusted for minutes. Translates to about 1 additional steal per game. [B][U]Blocks[/U][/B] No contest. 13-14 dominates, with 71 more blocks on the year, or 62 when adjusted. Translates to about 1.5 blocks more per game. Not surprising given Stewart (110) and Dolson (93)—compared with Phees (77) and Gabby (52). Advantage: 13-14. [B][U]PF[/U][/B] 13-14 fouled slightly more, when adjusted. But the difference is rather negligible. Not surprisingly, the shot blockers and rebounders (Stewie, Dolson; Phees, Gabby) fouled the most on each group. [B][U]Conclusion[/U][/B] If it is not already obvious, it should be clear that comparing these kinds of figures cannot begin to tell us the whole story. The 16-17 starters were obviously a more potent and efficient offensive group. But the stats don’t adequately convey the defensive abilities of the teams’ starters. The 13-14 [I]team[/I] averaged 82.1 points/game, while giving up 47.8 pts/game. The 16-17 [I]team[/I] averaged 87.1 points/game, while giving up 54.9/game. The 13-14 team had Kia Stokes at 6’3” subbing in where necessary and giving a big front court. The 16-17 team matched that with Butler at 6’5”. Moriah was a sophomore, and her game was still developing. Can’t say without watching the 13-14 games whether she was generally more effective defensively than Saniya 16-17 (her counterpart). KML was probably more effective defensively than KLS. Difficult to argue that the combo of Stewie and Dolson were [I]not[/I] as effective defensively than Collier and Gabby. And in fact, they were probably considerably more effective in tandem. (Who would [I]you[/I] rather face when driving to the hoop?) That leaves Kia and Bria. Here, the nod has to go to Bria—[I]way[/I] more rebounds, assists and steals, even when adjusted for minutes. In short, while the 13-14 starters were not as efficient offensively, their defense more than made up for any resulting difference. Advantage: 13-14. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Comparing the Starting Five: 2016-17 vs. 2013-14
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom