Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="UCFBfan, post: 3544793, member: 2248"] [URL unfurl="true"]https://sports.yahoo.com/ncaa-president-mark-emmert-no-sports-without-students-on-campus-162457332.html[/URL] >>[I]We’ve reminded you in this space many times that no one is in charge. The NCAA will have little say in football’s return. The conference commissioners are meeting every day on Zoom, but there’s still a worry that leagues are going to eventually scatter to uphold their best interests.[/I]<< This is going to be very interesting. The NCAA is falling apart and almost done for. The fact that they have zero control over any school is now very apparent. So let's say schools start going at it based on their states guidelines. Many southern and Midwestern states have not been hit as hard and have lessened restrictions. I could see many SEC and Big 12 schools start up. However, I look at the B1G, what happens if Iowa and Nebraska can play but the rest can't? Do they go forward playing? Same with ACC? Miami, Clemson, FSU can play but Syracuse and BC are absolute no. So some of those conferences decide to go forward without their conference mates for now. What happens to TV revenue? Do those conferences still feel ok giving non playing members their 20+ million dollars when they don't play a down of football? Does Iowa and Nebraska stay in the B1G if they can't play? Do these conferences still get massive TV deals for this season if they can't play? It's going to be an interesting mess. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,396

Messages: 4,394,248

Members: 10,208

Latest member: jskwrite