digger - powerful stuff!
You have made the choices that were perfect for you with grace and dignity.
I would just say that each situation is unique unto itself, it is never easy, and no one should ever feel pressure to conform to what others think in so personal a situation.
You know that I respect your observation and insights, please take as a compliment the fact that I always seem to respond to your posts. Everything you say is true. Indeed, I am a strong advocate of bucking civilized conformity, that is where the great irony lies.
Everyday I get 20+ articles coming up on my Google Alerts in regards to brain health and Alzheimer’s. I read but a few in their entirety, mainly those corresponding to quality of life links to brain health, but make a mental tabulation of all the topics that come up. The web works much like broadcast media, an echo chamber exists where a common theme or research will be picked up by various outlets, thus lending the authority of quantity to the conclusions drawn.
The echo chamber has focused on the costs of caregiving the past two weeks. In reality, the costs have been echoed much more than that. The “horrors” from the “burden” of caregiving is conveyed exponentially more than the “grace and dignity” of “sacrifice.” False perception often leads to harmful reality, that is after all why you caution against conformity and I quite agree. However, in our society this reality born out of perception and conformity reinforces the horrors from burden notion rather than the rewards from sacrifice … for many additional lifestyle choices besides caregiving I might add. My voice is the more nonconformist one, with the aim to nurture an alternative perception and thereby an alternative reality.
There is good reason to do so. Talk about harmful conformity! Classic economics calls for us to conform to the theory that self-interest is rational and social systems work best on self-interest. Enlightenment philosophy calls for us to conform to the assumption that humans are naturally bad or, at best, primitive and the enlightened reason born out of civilization needs to save us from ourselves. Meanwhile, mass media plays to the most negative of our emotions to conform us to these economic and enlightenment ideals. Even if this is all true, conforming to the perceptions of self-interest and being naturally bad certainly causes more harm than good.
Yet it is not true. Research from all over the country: Berkeley, UMich, Duke (yuk), etc. reveal that humans are naturally altruistic (actually ecologists have identified this trait in us long ago). Altruism increases longevity; altruism slows cognitive decline; altruism creates contentment. Ninety-eight percent of the people reading this, if they dig down to their souls, are capable of identifying with this conclusion. The other two percent correspond to people without empathy. Our problem is we behave much differently in the context of mass society (one of the defining characteristics of civilization) than we do in the context of family or small communities.
Thus my “rewards from sacrifice” voice is not only the nonconformist one, it is the most healthy choice to make, if individuals can buck societal perceptions and conformity to classic economics, enlightenment philosophy and mass media. So while I agree wholeheartedly with your caution that everyone’s life situation is different and calls for different approaches, that one should be true to themselves rather than conform, is it not ironic that you make this caution in response to the opinion that is less perceived by the public yet has more natural benefits?