After this year, Geno should retire from UConn and become the next Dr. Phil on morning talk shows. That's what this sounds like....Sorry, I don't buy this seat-of-the-pants cultural criticism. Because of technology, the world is changing at its quickest pace ever by several standard deviations. Trying to analyze "kids today" over the past 25 years in isolation of these spectacular and scary changes (such as: will my job be replaced by a robot?) is like trying to typify March weather based on one day.
He says lots of things about the difficulties he has finding players to recruit, this being just the latest and by far the most talked about. Some of it has to do with the transformation that has occurred with the Uconn program specifically, and some have to do with either perceived or actual changes in society - just because socisety is changing more rapidly today than 100 years ago, doesn't make those changes any more real. And an example is this particular clip - with 35 million views and counting, I fully expect to see some seriously enthusiastic benches in every sport over the next year! And Uconn was one of the first teams I remember seeing where every player went to help up a player on the floor, and people sprinted to the sideline for time outs or when they were subbed, but it is all over the sport now - emulation being a form of flattery.
On his issues with recruiting - things about the program that have changed:
1. When he started, getting a #50 ranked player would help improve his team measurably and nranked players were important recruits, now they generally provide bench depth.
2. When he started, no one he recruited needed to handle the pressure of the glare of publicity, they practiced and played in obscurity - now they need to have a level of poise and he has had at least one player transfer because they couldn't.
3. When he started getting into the conference tournament was a goal, now the expectation every year is a FF and an NC - some players do not thrive under that pressure and he needs to identify those that will and are willing to put in the effort that those expectations demand.
On Societal changes:
1. Getting an athletic scholarship was certainly a goal for many athletes and a nice idea for many parents, but for women it had not yet become a family imperative and focus - now it has become an obsession. part of that has to do with both the inflation in the value of a college education and the fact that college education costs have outstripped inflation.
2. Sports networks and plays of the day/highlight tapes have proliferated and on-line viral videos have proliferated (come into existence) and glorified individualism in all team sports and what started as professional behavior is emulated down to the peewee level.
3. Multiple sport athletes have all but disappeared, and young athletes are training and playing a single sport year around. And they are playing more games and training individually so they are developing individually and not getting the level of coaching and team training they used to. Nor are they going from being a star in their best sport, to being a great teammate in their secondary sports.
So the program changes impose restrictions on the player pool that will succeed in the program, while the societal changes reduce the athletes that the coaches want to recruit either because of their families or themselves. Did the societal issues exist before, I am sure they did, but the pool of players that could succeed in the program was larger so they probably weren't as noticeable. And they weren't as wide spread given the changes that have accelerated them. They used to talk about 'Stage Moms' going back to the beginnings of Hollywood, so the ambitious parent has been around at least that long, and it has certainly been around in sports since I was a kid with the obnoxious father in the stands, but in girls sports it has certainly been a more recent phenomenon, and one that certainly seems to have proliferated over the last 20 years.