Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Championship Commonalities
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="diggerfoot, post: 3206940, member: 1673"] Previous threads led me to reflect on what our championship teams have in common. There were four factors that jumped out at me; I hope others add different commonalities that come to their mind. Out of 11 championship teams: 4 had multiple bigs of 6'4" or taller. 8 had at least one big 6'4" or taller. (Which means we won almost as many championships with no bigs as with multiple bigs) 9 had a transcendent player on the team (Taurasi, Moore or Stewart). 9 had multiple All-Americans on the team, including the two who did not have a transcendent player. 10 had the best point guard at the time (I treat Taurasi as a PG for this, as she was the assist and floor leader). 11 had at least one All-American While either a transcendent player or multiple All-Americans have been necessary, the most important position appears to be point guard. It is revealing that all championships won without a big had both a transcendent player and the best point guard (by a country mile), and for two of those years they were one and the same. I regret saying I doubt we are a championship team next year, as it always depends on the context. However, the context next year is that Ionescu is likely transcendent, assumes point guard roles and may be on a team with multiple All-Americans (but even without that I like Oregon's chances). Dangerfield is great, but Ionescu is better. My only reservation with Ionescu is she apparently does not endear herself to teammates like a Taurasi or a Bird. However, the year after that Ionescu is gone and Bueckers is in. Though she only will be a freshman she may be on a team with multiple All-Americans (Williams, Walker, Westbrook and ONO all have that potential, perhaps others) and at least one legitimate big. I don't know how well Muhl's game translates to college basketball but if it translates well I see a Taurasi/Rizzotti like combo by their sophomore years (too much talent for Muhl to be a starter her freshman year), with Muhl being the best point in the nation, Bueckers being a transcendent player and multiple All-Americans on the team. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,422
Messages
4,395,694
Members
10,209
Latest member
gemini*trvl
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Championship Commonalities
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom