As others on here have pointed out in other threads the problem with the AAC is that there are 5 very good teams and 5 terrible teams. Nothing in between. The top 5 should be in the NCAA Tournament and the bottom 5 won't even be in the NIT. No middle class would be a problem going forward so hopefully some of those bottom 5 improve in the coming years.#10 Cincy
#16 Louisville
#17 UConn
#19 Memphis
#24 SMU
Yeah, this conference is terrible
Saturday will be a war...
On the other hand 50% of your teams being ranked isn't too shabby.As others on here have pointed out in other threads the problem with the AAC is that there are 5 very good teams and 5 terrible teams. Nothing in between. The top 5 should be in the NCAA Tournament and the bottom 5 won't even be in the NIT. No middle class would be a problem going forward so hopefully some of those bottom 5 improve in the coming years.
On the other hand 50% of your teams being ranked isn't too shabby.
Right.I know it isn't the same but the Big East in football got creamed for too much parity in their league. No dominant teams and no doormats made for good in-conference play but killed them in terms of rankings, reputation and publicity.
Problem isn't a lack of quality -- the AAC is clearly better than pre-merger ACC was.#10 Cincy
#16 Louisville
#17 UConn
#19 Memphis
#24 SMU
Yeah, this conference is terrible
Saturday will be a war...
Right.
You want doormats.
Just doormats who are only doormats in the league. That's how the old Big Eas was. DePaul was always bad, but the other teams would be pretty bad, but have solid metrics.
When half of your teams are ranked in the top25, it's an accomplishment. There's no other way to slice it. And teams like Temple and Houston won't stay this bad for very long. They both have real reasons for believing that they are going to improve. So even after we lose Louisville, we should still be a solid conference.
I think the toughest thing for many of us is to properly assess this league in the shadow of the old Big East, which was without doubt the greatest basketball conference of all time. And the American and the new Big East are both worse off for not being together (the parts are unfortunately not equal to the sum). But this conference is showing that it is not a death sentence for us, and so long as we continue to send 4 or 5 teams to the dance every year, we'll be in good shape for as long as we're in the conference...
Agreed. The only real "rivalry" is Memphis vs Cincinnati and neither of those schools consider each other their primary rival. You know you don't have rivalries when UConn-Cincinnati is probably your second best "rivalry" in league play.Problem isn't a lack of quality -- the AAC is clearly better than pre-merger ACC was.
The problem is a lack of rivalries.
If Louisville were stuck here, this conference would have more than a chance. The problem is surely the addition of Tulane, Tulsa and East Carolina. The conference could easily carry a South Florida and Central Florida (2 schools which might occasionally throw a good team together) if it weren't for the incoming subpar bball schools.