Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WhereistheDove?, post: 4259159, member: 1109"] Very different situations. Purdue basically has a 50/50 timeshare between two centers. There were 3 centers at UConn, and regardless of views on whether it was coaching/system issues, Carlton was pretty clearly #3 of the group and unlike Whaley, did not have any position versatility. If Carlton had stayed, he was probably looking at a similar 10 mpg when Sanogo and Whaley were healthy. Clearly that was not going to work for him and he found a better situation. His success at Houston does not necessarily have to be an indictment of Hurley. It can just be that he found a better situation for his abilities, UConn had two better options for their system, and he very fairly wanted a bigger role for his last year. [/QUOTE]