Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Hans Sprungfeld, post: 2559234, member: 181"] As is commonly the case, your analysis and argument are measured, reasonable, and fact-based. Here is something you might be missing, and I offer this in the spirit of being helpful to both you and [USER=192]@willie99[/USER]: I 'double-read' The Boneyard a lot. The first time I scroll down the page, I don't see the comments from those I ignore. (Heck, I miss entire posts if I'm logged in, like Scrappy's query on Glen Miller). On my second take, I click on "Show Ignored Content" and see who inspired outrage, as well as hissy fits between the relentlessly annoying from all points of view. Yes, [USER=676]@whaler11[/USER], I do this too. It fills some time I used to spend watching good basketball. Here's where I'm going with this - there have only been 2 comments made here by posters I ignore. These anguished barbs are not coming from the pitchfork crowd. It doesn't matter that you can accurately claim that 20-20 hindsight paints a false picture when perception so frequently beats reality in emotional matters. And not for nothing, a sixth man who puts up 3.3 assists a game sounds good to me. [/QUOTE]