Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="BRS24, post: 4560362, member: 197"] CC's "thoughts" on #1 seeds: [LIST] [*]Iowa's dismantling of Ohio State in the Big Ten final might have been the weekend's most eye-popping event, and the Hawkeyes are now knocking on the door of a No. 1 seed. [*]The Big 12 will have plenty to say about how the bracket settles. [*]South Carolina and Indiana are locks, but Stanford, Virginia Tech and Iowa are competing for the final two spots. [*]The Hokies and Hawkeyes just won conference tournament titles. Stanford is the only one with a regular-season championship. [/LIST] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][B]WHAT ABOUT UConn, Charlie?? [/B](said in my best Molly Ringwald "What about prom, Blane" voice)[/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000]It took almost the whole article before mentioning UConn, and it was in respect to injuries. No mention of NET or SOS for us. Just the injuries. Listen, there are way more experts on this board that understand NET, SOS, S-curve, and all the other stats that are used to decide seeding, but the fact that he's not mentioning that we've had two fairly dominant games in the BET, the last of which was a complete turn around from when Marquette beat us? I would love Megan Gauer or anyone else that does bracket analyses, to question him directly about his bias and disregard for UConn. Won't happen, but man, I'd love to see someone "Jon Stewart" him. I actually enjoy upsets, however when factors are not applied equally to teams, and therefore impacting the seeding, it makes the whole thing farcical.[/COLOR] [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.espn.com/womens-college-basketball/story/_/id/35796250/women-ncaa-bracket-debate-no-1-seeds-selection-sunday[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach