Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my data
Reply to thread | The Boneyard
Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
UConn Men's Basketball
UConn Women's Basketball
UConn Football
Media
The Uconn Blog
Verbal Commits
This is UConn Country
Field of 68
CT Scoreboard Podcasts
A Dime Back
Sliders and Curveballs Podcast
Storrs Central
Men's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Women's Basketball
News
Roster
Schedule
Standings
Football
News
Roster
Depth Chart
Schedule
Football Recruiting
Offers
Commits
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Bracketology 1/28
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="willtalk, post: 3022845, member: 1220"] What I am saying is that the RPI stays as is except the adjustment is used by the selection committee for the purposes of rectification in order to eliminate games that give a false impression of the strength of the team via the won loss record of the teams they played. What it will do is eliminate cup cakes. You know those teams that have no chance in hell of winning. It also will eliminate then as counting as a win while also eliminating the negative impact on the final RPI. Therefor a team could play a tune up or do a favor for a coach without it negatively affecting their end RPI. Many of those really bad D1 teams are no better than D2 teams anyway. Those are not counted as wins by selection committee's right now anyway. The whole point of the RPI is to give a more rational picture to a teams won/lost record. They have always eliminated non D1 schools from their won lost record in respect to bracketing any way. All this does is to make the same sort of adjustment in respect to lower D1 teams that are also not competitive enough to deserve to be counted as a win. Any team in the top ten should have any team rated lower than 200 even count as a win. The bracketing committee does this anyway by punishing teams for weak schedules. What this will do is create a standard system for do so. It will eliminate those games both in wins and RPI handicapping. It does not eliminate RPI . it is still used but this would be used to create a more consistent measure of strength of schedule. You obviously have to have the RPI to begin with. The whole point is to eliminate cupcakes from a teams won lost record while also adjusting the negative impact those cupcakes would have on a strength of schedule. The do this anyway, but only in their heads, This would provide them a formula for doing so and create more consistency to how cup cake schedules are dealt with. What is considered a cup cake would of course vary depending on where they ended up on the RPI scale. This would have no real effect since the original RPI would still act as a starting point and the adjustment would only serve to eliminate a few non relevant games. It's not much different than eliminating the top and low scores in the Olympics. That is also nothing but an adjustment to create more consistency in scoring. [/QUOTE]
Verification
First name of men's bb coach
Post reply
Forum statistics
Threads
164,403
Messages
4,394,637
Members
10,207
Latest member
jskwrite
.
..
Forums
UConn Athletics
UConn Women's Basketball Forum
Bracketology 1/28
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom