Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Scrutineer, post: 2850681, member: 8240"] We Casual Fans are very logical in our assessments and believe there undeniable proof of a break. Let me explain. No break, no flow, whether water or recruits. Therefore if there is any flow, water or recruits, there must have been a break. Bouknight has committed as a recruit. Thus, logically, there had to have been a break or there would not be a commitment from Bouknight. Logic once again proves Chief overcame all the doubters and naysayers. [/QUOTE]