Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CL82, post: 2620978, member: 44"] You misunderstood me. What was thrust upon AD Dave was the State advisory committee creating two fictions: 1) that the start date was earlier that the stated contractual start date and 2) that Randy manage's Corey even though his contract states otherwise. Without those two "recharactorization" of the actual terms there is no conflict with CT's ethics rules. The rest of what you wrote is moot. Eventually Corey and UConn will prevail. The university and AD have stood with Randy and Corey, appropriately in my view. [/QUOTE]