Blind Player Comparison

[OkaForPrez]

Player A:

Points per 40: 21.1
Rebounds per 40: 7.35
eFG: 58%
Turnovers per 40: 1.87

Player B:
Points per 40: 20.4
Rebounds per 40: 6.05
eFG: 50%
Turnovers per 40: 3.88









































Player A is Deandre Daniels
Player B is CJ Fair

 

[TheRealKBuks]

Player A: Points per 40: 21.1 Rebounds per 40: 7.35 eFG: 58% Turnovers per 40: 1.87 Player B: Points per 40: 20.4 Rebounds per 40: 6.05 eFG: 50% Turnovers per 40: 3.88 Player A is Deandre Daniels Player B is CJ Fair

I like CJ fair as a player but with all the talk he gets I would say this is definitive proof of how bad people are sleeping on Deandre

No Escalators

 

[Tenspro2002]

Whoever they are, those are really impressive numbers for guys who can't see!

 

[Migs]

Overshadowed by Bazz.

 

[Kitaman]

Send it to ESPN...................................................................... no, wait till end of season (after draft).

 

[caw]

Daniels has been spectacular the past 7 games. Can't ignore the first two, but it seems pretty obvious something clicked into place after halftime against Detroit. I think he's up to something like 16.5 ppg, 5.5 rpg on 56-50-84% shooting in the past seven games. That is including the poor first half against Detroit, where he was 0-4 or something. Hopefully he continues on this 7 game trend. He has been overshadowed by Napier and to an extent Giffey, but he has been as good as most expected he would be coming into the season the past seven games.

 

[intlzncster]

Daniels has been spectacular the past 7 games. Can't ignore the first two, but it seems pretty obvious something clicked into place after halftime against Detroit. I think he's up to something like 16.5 ppg, 5.5 rpg on 56-50-84% shooting in the past seven games. That is including the poor first half against Detroit, where he was 0-4 or something. Hopefully he continues on this 7 game trend. He has been overshadowed by Napier and to an extent Giffey, but he has been as good as most expected he would be coming into the season the past seven games.

If he keeps playing well, and continues to be overshadowed, then UCONN's on to a good thing.

 

[GlastonTim]

He's a lottery pick

 

[Joobie]

WOW! Both players are pretty impressive! Especially when you consider that they can't SEE anything

 

[OkaForPrez]

WOW! Both players are pretty impressive! Especially when you consider that they can't SEE anything

No like for repeating joke from earlier in thread.

 

[UChusky916]

No like for repeating joke from earlier in thread.

Yet, the joke from earlier in the thread was also a repeat from a similar thread in the past...

 

[OkaForPrez]

Yet, the joke from earlier in the thread was also a repeat from a similar thread in the past...

I assumed it was the same guy lol.

Edit: You're right. Last time it was Palatine. A bunch of corny bastads up in here. Is it 9 yet?

 

[champs99and04]

I assume you got these numbers from basketball-reference? I only mention this because the per 40 minute numbers on basketball-reference are a bit skewed, because for whatever reason, they list all of our players as having played 0 minutes in the Detroit game. If you account for the 15 minutes DeAndre played in the Detroit game, that brings his per 40 numbers to a slightly more modest 19.9 points and 6.9 rebounds. Your point still stands, just thought it was something worth mentioning for any time somebody cites per 40 minute numbers in the future.

 

[CTBasketball]

CJ Fair will get drafted over DeAndre, which is the sad thing.

 

[OkaForPrez]

I assume you got these numbers from basketball-reference? I only mention this because the per 40 minute numbers on basketball-reference are a bit skewed, because for whatever reason, they list all of our players as having played 0 minutes in the Detroit game. If you account for the 15 minutes DeAndre played in the Detroit game, that brings his per 40 numbers to a slightly more modest 19.9 points and 6.9 rebounds. Your point still stands, just thought it was something worth mentioning for any time somebody cites per 40 minute numbers in the future.

I use statsheet.com for all my analysis. The RBper40 and the TO per 40 I had to calculate using the per game figures they provide and extrapolating using the mpg stat.

Looks like statsheet has the same problem though.

 

[Palatine]

I didn't know DeAndre was blind.

 

[imno1]

I love DD and what he means to our team but i'm not sold on him as a pro yet. I think he'll be here for his senior year.

 

[intlzncster]

CJ Fair will get drafted over DeAndre, which is the sad thing.

Leaving aside the question of whether he declares or not, that is probably a good thing for DD. He'd benefit from being on a better team.

 

[msgordon]

fairs struggled taking on more offense, i think hes much stronger as a 2nd or 3rd option (although i suspect the same may be true for deandre). ennis and cooney have definitely been better