Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="housekeys, post: 4615444, member: 2379"] The college football realignments, that started a generation ago, created "the haves and have nots". At the time, there seems to have been more haves than have nots, and UConn was clearly sitting at the front of the "have nots" table. More and more, the definition of the "have nots" will change. Obviously, it is all about having and not having money. But on the competitive landscape, basically, unless you are a peer of Alabama in football, you are one of the "have nots", IMO. Today, as the P12 and B12 (potentially the ACC) are torn apart, I get the feeling there will be more "have nots" than ever before. It's all about money, of course, but there is always strength in numbers. The have nots are growing. Maybe the competitive interest "pendulum" will swing back and some of the money will follow? [/QUOTE]