big WNBA news--change in playoff format | The Boneyard

big WNBA news--change in playoff format

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
29,047
Reaction Score
54,176

I think this is a welcome change. No more byes. No more one and out.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2018
Messages
1,089
Reaction Score
2,942
Really interesting that Games 1 and 2 are hosted by the higher seed in the best of 3, with the 3rd Game on the lower seeds home court.
 

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
29,047
Reaction Score
54,176
I wonder if this is something the league had been considering for a while, or if it was a knee jerk reaction to none of the teams receiving byes advancing in the playoffs this last season?
 
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
5,075
Reaction Score
13,929
There are some who seem to dislike the bye option going away. I recall the reporter who covers UConn for their local paper and a couple others on Twitter bringing this up.

Personally, I don't know if losing the bye is a good or bad thing just yet. This season, the bye didn't provide much benefit from what I remember. Only time will tell.

This format kind of reminds me of what it was like with the NBA years ago when the first round was a best of 5, with the following rounds being best of 7.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
6,757
Reaction Score
21,187
I like the fact that the WNBA is not afraid to try new things. I am not gonna lie. I am a huge fan of the single elimination game. Sad to see it go away. I think that first year (2016) Phoenix was an 8th seed. Took out a 5th seed and a 3rd seed team. Phoenix ended up getting swept by Minnesota in the Semis. Made for some exciting games in those single elimination games.
 

eebmg

Fair and Balanced
Joined
Nov 28, 2016
Messages
20,037
Reaction Score
88,660
I like the fact that the WNBA is not afraid to try new things. I am not gonna lie. I am a huge fan of the single elimination game. Sad to see it go away. I think that first year (2016) Phoenix was an 8th seed. Took out a 5th seed and a 3rd seed team. Phoenix ended up getting swept by Minnesota in the Semis. Made for some exciting games in those single elimination games.
Agreed. I liked the old system except I thought the second round should have been 2 of 3. Definitely a reaction to the players. I never heard a player endorse the one and done.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2015
Messages
570
Reaction Score
2,168
Even Sue Bird was quoted this year saying she didn't like the single elimination, that she'd like to see the league do a series. So not surprising.
 
Joined
May 1, 2020
Messages
5,075
Reaction Score
13,929
I see the pros and cons to the single elimination game. There are fringe benefits to the league and teams by expanding the play-off format though.

More games mean more ticket sales and broadcasting revenue. I don't blame the WNBA working on leveraging the increase in viewership to their advantage.
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702

I think this is a welcome change. No more byes. No more one and out.
They saw the #6 seed Sky beat the #5 seed Mercury in the finals and said "Nope, nope, nope". :p

I know the Sky winning from the #6 seed already made the regular season look pointless, but now it's a especially pointless as there is really very little incentive for finishing with a top seed.
 

Orangutan

South Bend Simian
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
5,868
Reaction Score
26,702
Agreed. I liked the old system except I thought the second round should have been 2 of 3. Definitely a reaction to the players. I never heard a player endorse the one and done.
Exactly the same for me. Single elim is fine for the first round where only seeds 5-8 are competing. The #3 or #4 seed getting knocked out in a single-elim game was a bit harsh, though.
 

MilfordHusky

Voice of Reason
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
36,778
Reaction Score
123,290
I prefer the new format, though I don't like the 3rd game being at home for the lower seed, but it gives the higher seed an incentive to sweep. Finishing with a better record gives the advantage of playing a weak team, but no byes. I'm ok with that.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
2,335
Reaction Score
5,594
I prefer the new format, though I don't like the 3rd game being at home for the lower seed, but it gives the higher seed an incentive to sweep. Finishing with a better record gives the advantage of playing a weak team, but no byes. I'm ok with that.
Would have rather seen a first game at top seed, go on road for 2nd game, then back to top seed for 3rd game if necessary.
 

Bigboote

That's big-boo-TAY
Joined
Dec 16, 2016
Messages
6,706
Reaction Score
33,647
I still don't like it when over half the teams make the playoffs. I know other leagues do it, but that doesn't make it right. I'd prefer a first-round bye for the top two and the first round be 3 vs 6 and 4 vs 5.

But this is a HUGE improvement of two rounds of one-and-done. I hate the single play-in wildcard game in MLB too.
 

Mulder

In Search of One Objective Poster
Joined
Dec 18, 2019
Messages
657
Reaction Score
572
The 'one and done' playoff game adds spice to the contest. However, if this system is preferable, so be it.
 

Online statistics

Members online
644
Guests online
3,264
Total visitors
3,908

Forum statistics

Threads
156,871
Messages
4,068,271
Members
9,949
Latest member
Woody69


Top Bottom