Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="cancontent, post: 4506934, member: 10709"] Similar to how Iowa fans are seeing it, others will have their own perspective. It is what it is. Like I said before the referees made the right call. If memory is correct, it's called an intentional because of a technicality. The rule description includes unnecessary action (I could have the term wrong) that can be called an intentional foul. It only falls into that category for that reason. This is why I find it funny. It's being taken too literally when it only was called this way because of how it's classified. Timing or not, it happened and it had to be called. On top of that she wasn't ejected, so the refs obviously didn't see it as malicious. And we've all seen head scratching things happen in all sports with bizarre calls and endings happen. This is just another one of them. [/QUOTE]