That will continue.What's the diff? They allow waivers to everyone and their dog except when they come to UConn.
Agree with this AND agree that its good from a student-athlete perspective. Its also the end of viable college sports.I'll repeat what I said on the football version of this post.
I don't like it. In my cynical view, this is so the big dogs can pick the cherries off the lower teams and send their own cherry pits back. Rich get richer with no penalty and the smaller school likely loses out in the exchange.
Great for the student athletes, absolutely awful for "G5" schools.
Another angle:In my cynical view, this is so the big dogs can pick the cherries off the lower teams and send their own cherry pits back. Rich get richer with no penalty and the smaller school likely loses out in the exchange.
Yep, just like the Rising Star G5 coaches. They leave or get picked off and go on to P5 success hurting the players he recruited and the G5 school.I'll repeat what I said on the football version of this post.
I don't like it. In my cynical view, this is so the big dogs can pick the cherries off the lower teams and send their own cherry pits back. Rich get richer with no penalty and the smaller school likely loses out in the exchange.
Great for the student athletes, absolutely awful for "G5" schools.
Free agency. Good for the kids but would be an absolute disaster for schools.
It may not be good for some student athletes. Coaches often take a multi-year approach to teaching physical and mental skills, and some coaches may be reluctant to put that investment into a kid who they think will just jump to a bigger school the following year.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on that. You also have no justification or reason that schools will be fine. Well the schools will be fine, but I can't see how most basketball teams would.People always assert this with no justification or reason it is true.
It's just nonsense. The schools will be fine.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on that. You also have no justification or reason that schools will be fine. Well the schools will be fine, but I can't see how most basketball teams would.
Well this is just so obvious it’s ludicrous. E.g. Akok and Bouknight have breakout freshman years. Decide they want up their game a notch and transfer next year. Hurley is screwed and by the way Jackson decides there are better options. The program building is back to square one. Seems like this may be a problem for somebody.It's the same pool of players, they shift around. All teams will be able to fill their roster. Players have a chance to get out of bad situations faster. Coaches have more ability to fill roster holes quickly.
All the games will be played. It's not like the ocean will swallow NCAA headquarters in Indianapolis or anything.
I'm not sure what is not fine about that.
Can you name a single problem that this would likely cause that is serious at all?