Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="hoophuskee, post: 3782740, member: 3535"] I don't' understand your point here. And I am not arguing with you. Because I don't understand what you're saying. Regarding the men, are you saying the quality is higher because the super young players leave early? And are you saying more balance equals higher quality? I can recall a couple on here years ago stating the disappointment they had with UCONN because they were blowing everyone out and they enjoy the men's game more. I recall that weekend I watched a men's game for a short time- that eventually went overtime between South Carolina and KY. I looked at the stats later in which both teams shot no more than 40% from the floor ,shot miserably from 3, shot poor free throws, and the assist to turnover ratio was terrible. Yet the game was close ie. - there was more balance. Is that high quality? Third- there were some posters on here before season started that spoke of how the women's game has evolved because of size and athleticism. You don't agree? So you think teams that have won in the past such as the 15-16 team with a thin Stewie and smaller Tuck, and the 16-17 team of SC that went small - these smaller teams can still win because the game has remained stagnant? I wonder sometimes if we get too caught up trying to make a definitive statement. But I'll make one. I see a lot of blowouts (as Clubber Lang said- he predicted a lot of pain) the next several years. This year to some degree there are questions. But the next several -- lots of destruction. And I think it will be so beautiful to watch. And I am hopeful these teams might be in the conversation of greatest wcbb teams of all-time. IMO that "quality" is better than the "quality" the men's game can offer. Their superstars don't stay. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,486

Messages: 4,398,169

Members: 10,212

Latest member: MurrDog