Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alydar, post: 3367675, member: 730"] Four of the top 10 in December of 2019. Go back and look at the conference over a longer time period and you'll see that both Oregon schools sucked. UCLA has had a couple of decent teams but hardly what I would call challenging. The only team in the PAC12 to do anything consistently over the last 10 years that comes close to being described as a challenging program is the Trees. I doubt her goals are linited to the PAC12? I doubt that but it would certainly be what I would try and sell her on if I was the coach. I stated very clearly that Stanford will have 4 challenging games IN CONFERENCE. They will no doubt play a couple more close ones but that will be due to their own performance rather than their opponents. I also stated that there are no challenging conferences in wcbb for an elite level team. ZERO. NADA. Name one conference that would have challenged UConn consistently over the years. And by challenged I mean losing 2 game a year and playing another 6 that end up being close wins? That conference doesn't exist. My point, which you seem to have missed, was that Jones like most elite recruits announcing their decisions are just parroting what they were told in the sales pitch. For example: Q: Why did you buy the Ford? A: They have the best cars, the best warranty and give the best service. Get it? [/QUOTE]