Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Get a Job, post: 3872825, member: 9775"]
Don't be silly. Everyone on here (as far as I can tell) agrees that the computer rankings will do a better job of rating the teams in a season where all teams play 10ish OOC games. This season, it's all out the window. More games could help, but it's not a given. Look at Colgate. Adding games late could help, but it's not a given. Look at UNC-Marquette for an example.

I have understood you to be saying, in a nutshell, that UConn is guilty of shooting themselves in the foot by not scrambling to stuff more games into the final 2 weeks of the season. My critique of that position is [U]not[/U] that adding more games will definitely hurt. My critique is that:
[LIST=1]
[*]Our current schedule is sufficient to get us in.
[*]I don't think it was as feasible to schedule these games as you think it was (and it certainly isn't feasible at all anymore).
[*]Side critique: You are responding to everyone's arguments with wild strawmen.
[/LIST]
[/QUOTE]

Verification

First name of men's bb coach