- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 9,051
- Reaction Score
- 39,134
If that's true then i'd sign up for this kid in a heartbeat. I looked at the video - all highlights, and a bit of hot doggin, but that's to be expected on a highlight video. The guy has serious hops and seems to have good instincts on defense, even when the offensive player is juking the ball all over the place, he doesn't get confused and block the arm of the other player. He seems to get all ball.Good news about this kid is that he is athletic yet not the type of ball player that will have one foot out the door the moment he arrives on campus. Bad news is that he sounds a little raw so you are getting far from a finished product. I have a gut feeling that this kid is gonna commit....
HIs game sounds much like what Cleveland Melvin was reported as being in high school and he has turned out to be pretty solid for an awful DePaul program.
I think melvin has a bigger frame. An inch or two and 20 pounds
Seriously? you shouldn't have to be reminded of how little rankings mean when picking out talent. Someone feel free to break out the list of star players here ranked ~70-100 (Lamb, Emeka to name a couple).He sounds like a nice player, but we're UConn -- we shouldn't be jumping out of our shoes over a guy ranked ~70 for whom we're competing against Auburn and Oregon.
If this is what our new Plan A recruits look like, maybe we've fallen further than I thought. Rankings aren't everything, but we've gotta have our sights set higher than this.
He sounds like a nice player, but we're UConn -- we shouldn't be jumping out of our shoes over a guy ranked ~70 for whom we're competing against Auburn and Oregon.
If this is what our new Plan A recruits look like, maybe we've fallen further than I thought. Rankings aren't everything, but we've gotta have our sights set higher than this.
Seriously? you shouldn't have to be reminded of how little rankings mean when picking out talent. Someone feel free to break out the list of star players here ranked ~70-100 (Lamb, Emeka to name a couple).
Also, Noah Vonleh is clearly our plan A with Bell being plan B.
Not sure he was always a Plan A. He wasn't getting much interest from us util about two months ago. We were on Dominic Woodson and other big guys early on. Then for various reasons we stopped recruiting kids or they cut us. Right now I would say with certainty that the staff would rather have Vonleh than Bell but are fine with Bell.
As opposed to our plan A, Vonleh, signing also leaving us with 5 frontcourt guys? Simply put we want Vonleh more than we want Bell, but we like both. Bell is a pretty sure bet at this point so we'll take him if we can get him, because if we don't pull the trigger on him we risk losing out on both leaving us with, god forbid, a plan C recruit and the second coming of MandledoveI agree in principle, but it's hard for Bell to be plan B when he'll probably accept our offer, leaving us with 5 frontcourt guys already signed for 2013 and maybe 1 ship available.
As opposed to our plan A, Vonleh, signing also leaving us with 5 frontcourt guys? Simply put we want Vonleh more than we want Bell, but we like both. Bell is a pretty sure bet at this point so we'll take him if we can get him, because if we don't pull the trigger on him we risk losing out on both leaving us with, god forbid, a plan C recruit and the second coming of Mandledove
Ya, I'm a big fan as well. I'm hoping he could come and be a Sticks/Adrien hybridI really like Bell. I think he may have grown some. I saw one website which had him at 6'9" and 210. I also saw a video where he looked every bit that size, very long, and reminded me of Stanley Robinson, FWIW.
Ya, I'm a big fan as well. I'm hoping he could come and be a Sticks/Adrien hybrid
Seriously? you shouldn't have to be reminded of how little rankings mean when picking out talent. Someone feel free to break out the list of star players here ranked ~70-100 (Lamb, Emeka to name a couple).
Also, Noah Vonleh is clearly our plan A with Bell being plan B.
It is far from the stupidest post ever seen on this board. He can correct me if I'm wrong, but often times a kid who is in the 70-80 range (or lower) will end up quite a bit better than a kid who was rated in the top 40. Kids like Okafor and Lamb were not top 50 kids but both obviously went in the top 12. I don't think Hilton Armstrong was even in the top 100 in high school, but he managed to be drafted 12th. Where was Thabeet rated in high school?In all seriousness this is the stupidest post I have ever read.
Yes, it gets blurry the further you go down, but did you just say all rankings are irrelevant? In that case I want the Harrison twins and you can take the #112 guy.
Yes, rankings matter!
As opposed to our plan A, Vonleh, signing also leaving us with 5 frontcourt guys? Simply put we want Vonleh more than we want Bell, but we like both. Bell is a pretty sure bet at this point so we'll take him if we can get him, because if we don't pull the trigger on him we risk losing out on both leaving us with, god forbid, a plan C recruit and the second coming of Mandledove
Let me give you a hand here since you seemed to badly misinterpret my statement. I said rankings "don't mean much when picking out talent." It probably would have been helpful to say that statement is more true outside of the top 10 or so recruits (maybe top 20 depending on the depth of a given class). When you get outside that top group of kids and you're actually "picking out talent" the rankings mean very little. Thank you UCONNfan1 for picking up on that and clarifying. As he said, guys in the 30-100 range are pretty much a crapshoot as far as how they're going to develop, but we are notorious for finding guys in that range and really developing them into good-great players.In all seriousness this is the stupidest post I have ever read.
Yes, it gets blurry the further you go down, but did you just say all rankings are irrelevant? In that case I want the Harrison twins and you can take the #112 guy.
Yes, rankings matter!