OT: - BC to play FL State with only 4 scholarship players. | The Boneyard

OT: BC to play FL State with only 4 scholarship players.

RichZ

Fort the ead!
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,263
Reaction Score
22,397

So how is it we can't play games because someone was once in a room with someone who knew someone who may have had Covid, but BC is forced to play with practice players because more than half their team is down with it?
 
Last edited:

UconnU

If he blocks 100, he blocks 100
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,767
Reaction Score
31,524
Anyone else concerned that we will be heavily penalized by the selection committee if we end up playing significantly less games than other teams? I was reading Borges article yesterday and Jay Wright is planning on playing every other day later this month to make up games. He seemed extremely concerned about the total number of games his team plays before March. We have played even less games and do not have the same sense of urgency. That struck me.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
16,406
Reaction Score
36,881
Anyone else concerned that we will be heavily penalized by the selection committee if we end up playing significantly less games than other teams? I was reading Borges article yesterday and Jay Wright is planning on playing every other day later this month to make up games. He seemed extremely concerned about the total number of games his team plays before March. We have played even less games and do not have the same sense of urgency. That struck me.
I expect to get very little benefit of the doubt for both:
1) playing many fewer games than other teams
2) playing without Bouknight for 6 weeks
 
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
1,451
Reaction Score
8,524
Anyone else concerned that we will be heavily penalized by the selection committee if we end up playing significantly less games than other teams? I was reading Borges article yesterday and Jay Wright is planning on playing every other day later this month to make up games. He seemed extremely concerned about the total number of games his team plays before March. We have played even less games and do not have the same sense of urgency. That struck me.

I think we'll be fine with the selection committee, but the team needs game experience to gel, experience different matchup challenges, and learn to closeout close games. Without that, it will be hard to get far in a one and done situation. As of this morning we have played fewer games than any other team in the kenpom top 40.
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
22,558
Reaction Score
7,494
Anyone else concerned that we will be heavily penalized by the selection committee if we end up playing significantly less games than other teams? I was reading Borges article yesterday and Jay Wright is planning on playing every other day later this month to make up games. He seemed extremely concerned about the total number of games his team plays before March. We have played even less games and do not have the same sense of urgency. That struck me.

No. Of all the things to be worrying about, I literally can not think of a single one more unlikely than the selection committee penalizing a basketball team because of its state's public health policies during an epidemic.

Computer programs don't penalize you for playing less games. They are perfectly capable of ranking teams who have played different numbers of games.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
32,595
Reaction Score
84,702

So how is it we can't play games because someone was once in a room with someone who knew someone who may have had Covid, but BC is forced to play with practice players because half their team is down wth it?

As usual, I feel like we are missing the obvious middle ground between these positions. UConn cancelling Sunday's game was not necessary. This game being played is not necessary. Common sense has completely left the building.
 

Bomber36

Respect All, Fear None.
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
7,624
Reaction Score
16,937

So how is it we can't play games because someone was once in a room with someone who knew someone who may have had Covid, but BC is forced to play with practice players because more than half their team is down with it?
Ouch...that game should be cancelled.
 
Joined
Nov 25, 2019
Messages
2,083
Reaction Score
6,555
As usual, I feel like we are missing the obvious middle ground between these positions. UConn cancelling Sunday's game was not necessary. This game being played is not necessary. Common

So how is it we can't play games because someone was once in a room with someone who knew someone who may have had Covid, but BC is forced to play with practice players because more than half their team is down with it?
For us, it's the state's protocols and how they differ from other states. Lots of teams lately have quarantined a player or a few players and still played their games. Hard to believe MA policies would allow BCU to play a game with so many quarantined. Maybe they got a special dispensation from the Pope............
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
5,165
Reaction Score
18,761
Joined
Nov 30, 2020
Messages
444
Reaction Score
1,978
No. Of all the things to be worrying about, I literally can not think of a single one more unlikely than the selection committee penalizing a basketball team because of its state's public health policies during an epidemic.

Computer programs don't penalize you for playing less games. They are perfectly capable of ranking teams who have played different numbers of games.
Actually, I couldn't think of a more likely scenario. It gives them a perfect excuse for when needing to explain what they may have gotten wrong- which they have to do every year, pandemic or not. Suffice it to say it's in our best interest to play as many games as we can...especially when there are other teams from states that are the same, if not MORE "unforgiving" towards COVID. NYC comes to mind....and a team from there that scrambled and scheduled a game on Sunday due to a cancellation from a certain other team.

Do we know if we are even practicing yet?
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,506
Reaction Score
68,994
No. Of all the things to be worrying about, I literally can not think of a single one more unlikely than the selection committee penalizing a basketball team because of its state's public health policies during an epidemic.

Computer programs don't penalize you for playing less games. They are perfectly capable of ranking teams who have played different numbers of games.
I don't know. I may be paranoid but it's like the NCAA looks for reasons to punish us. I have little faith.

As a side note. Every state thinks they are following the science. And none of what Connecticut has done has made Connecticut any safer than anywhere else.
 

willie99

Loving life & enjoying the ride, despite the bumps
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
7,152
Reaction Score
22,015
Seems to me we have the most restrictive policies in the country, outside of the IVY league.

Has athletic competition at any level turned into some super spreader event? They're playing games at every level in many communities. Sure athletes get sick, so do people living in a bubble, so that's not my question.

Are athletes at any level becoming seriously ill? Hospitalized? Or heaven forbid dying?

Have athletes playing at any level been connected to super spreader events involving friends and families?

I'm for taking precautions. I'm also about observing and learning from others. I don't think being at one extreme or the other is good for anybody. This post is intended to be apolitical, I'm advocating a more rational and uniform policy for playing games and living life.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
13,940
Reaction Score
93,666
Anyone else concerned that we will be heavily penalized by the selection committee if we end up playing significantly less games than other teams? I was reading Borges article yesterday and Jay Wright is planning on playing every other day later this month to make up games. He seemed extremely concerned about the total number of games his team plays before March. We have played even less games and do not have the same sense of urgency. That struck me.
No
 

XLCenterFan

CT, NE
Joined
Feb 25, 2018
Messages
3,539
Reaction Score
13,456
It’s especially odd because mass seems to have stricter covid protocols than CT, and they definitely have a robust system for testing and contacting individuals that have tested positive to keep tabs on them.
 

Online statistics

Members online
340
Guests online
1,501
Total visitors
1,841

Forum statistics

Threads
158,857
Messages
4,170,824
Members
10,043
Latest member
twdaylor104


.
Top Bottom