Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="SimpleDawg, post: 3077489, member: 9267"] Ohhh gosh. Another user getting so particular with semantics here. And you even bolded my statements... lol. It may not be an absolute fact, but I don't exactly have to add a IMO to every sentence I write here, do I? Actually, all you've said so far is if Oregon or Stanford or Louisville deserves a higher seed than us. You haven't actually said WHETHER they will or not, which is what I'm trying to say. I can't imagine a scenario where Oregon or Stanford will earn a #1. If you can, then that means they jump not only Mississippi State, but Louisville as well. I"m sure Louisville will be happy to know that Oregon - who has an even worse play recently than Louisville does, is going to be ranked higher than them for the same reason Louisville is being dropped so many spots. You sound incredibly impartial for someone who has to go on 5 different threads and beat this over the head. I'm not biased, actually. I actually thought Baylor deserved the #1 seed last year. Notre Dame got throttled by Louisville by 33 points - even though that game was early in the year. But Notre Dame's SOS rank was high. And Kristy Wallace had a season ending injury, which according to the committee affected their decision. I wouldn't call that being biased? I see Baylor's situation of last year like Mississippi State's this year, so i'm siding with the situation. One thing you have to realize is that 1) history isn't always gonna repeat just because it occurred last year 2) calling me biased because I'm a Bulldog is the easy road to take, but I don't exactly sound half as stringent as you do. I have a question for you. If we do get a #1 seed, will you be ok? ... [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,410

Messages: 4,394,748

Members: 10,208

Latest member: jskwrite