Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="southie, post: 3076961, member: 2527"] Actually, that's NOT what you said. You said "[I][B]The last #1 is between Louisville and Mississippi State whether you like it or not." [/B][/I] That is not a FACT. Maybe you're right about last season, and I was wrong; I'm okay with that. Crème was definitely wrong as he was sulking on TV after the bracket was announced and he didn't get all four #1 seeds correct. And, the reason Baylor did NOT get the last #1 seed like he was predicting is for a poor non-conference schedule and lack of Top 10-25 wins compared to the team who did get the last #1 seed. You'd think he'd learn from what the NCAA committee emphasized one year ago. And, Oregon (who I don't believe should be a #1 seed) still has a head-to-head win over MSU this season. MSU has not one single HIGHER ranking/record than Louisville or Stanford in any category which the committee factors in their decision. If there is, and I missed it, I'm all for looking at it. And, if you look at Q1-Q4 records, MSU played 8 games against Quadrant 4 teams (the worst team strength), while the other teams in consideration for a #1 seed played between 1 and 2 teams in Quadrant 4. That is a HUGE discrepancy. [URL='http://warrennolan.com/basketballw/2019/rpi-live']Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Live 2018-2019 Women's College Basketball - WarrenNolan.com[/URL] You don't need to tell me to "get over" anything. Unlike you, I am actually [B]impartial [/B]in who gets the #1 seeds. You are biased, and that is normal in supporting your team. And, your [B]opinion[/B] on here is no more important or credible than mine. [/QUOTE]

Verification: First name of men's bb coach

Forum statistics

Threads: 164,410

Messages: 4,394,748

Members: 10,208

Latest member: jskwrite