Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Cuango, post: 3889589, member: 3834"] I doubt it. I’m willing to bet she did not qualify because of the number of games. Do I know that for a fact? No. But you don’t know for a fact that your version of events is right either. It’s just my opinion of what is the most likely chain of events. I fully agree that two games is not enough, regardless of how she played. I simply think they should not have included her if she never had a chance to win. They should have announced a minimum number of games to qualify. It’s not like this is a new award. It’s even possible they had such a rule but there again, if they did, they didn’t do a good job of making sure people knew about it. Again, I know they don’t have to do that either but imo it would be better (for them too) if they made sure that the requirements were widely disseminated so the fans of players on the list could know if their player had no chance to win. [/QUOTE]