Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alydar, post: 3276427, member: 730"] Non-responsive? You used raw assist stats to "prove" Ionescu was a better pg. I showed the flaw in your reasoning. Assists and who gets them are in no small measure a function of a teams system. That's what my Rutgers comment was about. Ionescu would have been the same player at Rutgers but her stats would have labelled her as average in assists, which would be wrong. I'm not going to dispute Ionescu's value. That is obvious. My comment was about the usefulness of your evidence, which I thought was superficial. How many UConn games have you watched? Most UConn games are at 4:00pm on the left coast. If you only saw the big games (N Dame, Baylor, Louisville) you saw UConn on the road against the best teams in the country. Then look at Sabrina vs Baylor: 18pt (6-24) 4rb 6as. Dangerfield has played with 4 1st round W picks in the last 2 years and has been an afterthought in most of the articles written about UConn during that time (and has been playing hurt for 2 years) while Ionescu has been the main star at Oregon for her 1st 3 years. I'm not suggesting that Ionescu isn't the much better pro prospect. I just don't see the same gap between the 2 players as they enter their senior years that you seem to think exists. [/QUOTE]