The good, the bad and the Temple: http://stholeary.blogspot.com/2014/04/assessing-aac-after-year-1.html
The Horde, which covers UConn sports, harped on it so much that it has infected UConn fans, who now collectively want nothing to do with the AAC. Is it really so bad? The team won dual national titles in the Big East and the AAC. It seems to be working out, right?
I wish The Horde, and by proxy UConn fans, would focus on the program and not the confusing world of realignment.
That was a fair read I would say. The only part I had an issue with was your characterization of the influence of The Horde on the fan base. Using the BY as my point of reference, which by itself may not be fair, the fans wanted out before the AAC ever commenced. Why we want out has to do with financials and playing schools that we have very little in common with. It's hard to get too excited about a conference game versus a team from Texas or some other distant state. I feel this way moreso in football, and maybe that's because none of the AAC schools left have a great football pedigree. At least with Memphis in hoops it's a ranked school with great history (and some not so great history).
I actually think The Horde has under-reported conference realignment. They are mostly out of the loop and didn't take up our banner until the dual championships.
Of course it reached that number incrementally. I suspect that they may not have instituted the disembowelment plan if they knew the eventually cost, unless they thought the investment was worth it to keep control of the content.I hate it when writers can't do math. If ESPN had to increase multiple conference TV contracts to take the Big East apart, it didn't save itself a billion dollars. It actually cost ESPN about $1.5 billion MORE than they were offering the Big East, for a lot less content