Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="boog204, post: 3928905, member: 880"] I guess "win" needs to be defined. Cuse only won a single title. However, "dynasty" is highly subjective, imo. I view it as both a short dominant run ala the Cowboys/Yankees in the 90s but also a prolonged period of excellence. The dictionary even defines it that way --> "sports franchise which has a prolonged run of successful seasons." But I get the dynastic concept that we focus on more is multiple titles in a period of time. Change the word to legacy if you want. My whole point is that the dude, regardless if we like him or not, has never had a losing season and most years 'Cuse has been a contender. For 45 years. And, looking at their history, JB has won or tied for 10 conference titles. Again, does that qualify as "dynasty" in your book? Probably not. But, we'll never see another coach lead the same school for 45 years and win 20+ games almost 90% of the time. [/QUOTE]