This article is the perfect example of what "journalism" has become. If you aren't first to break a story, you are apparently at fault.
I don't fault ESPN at all for not running this story until they got proper evidence. This is quite the assertion to make and they SHOULD have real evidence before they report it. This isn't breaking a story about a trade rumor, this is someone's life. Good for Deadspin that they ran with this story. They aren't held to the same journalistic standards as ESPN and can take risks for stories like this. If ESPN had, and was proven wrong, I can only imagine the firestorm they would come under.
Now whether ESPN needs better fact-checkers and investigatory journalists is another story all together...